- UID
- 676482
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-9-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
AlohaDJ 发表于 2011-8-12 16:42
最初也错选了D,看完解释才明白。。D选项,1)使得stimulus里celebrities的相关信息成为摆设,而经验告诉我 ...
I like this explanation for it shows a commonly wrong judgement about logic valid.
Weaken is not to prove the polar opposite is necessary valid. Instead,it is to prove that the logic opposite is necessary valid.
The logic opposite for right is not right rather than wrong.
As for this question, no matter whether the number will be increase or decrease, the decrease of the price necessarily lead to the conclusion that the profit would not necessarily increase.
Remember, the original conclusion of the argument is the profit would necessarily increase. See the Point?最初也错选了D,看完解释才明白。。
D选项,1)使得stimulus里celebrities的相关信息成为摆设,而经验告诉我们CR原文里的每句话都不多余;2) sales=price*number, D选项只涉及了price(单价),即逗留时间短的顾客花费少,但number(翻台率)并未告知, So,我们有理由反驳说,即便每个客人逗留时间短花费少,但客人来的快走的快,用餐人数还多了呢,也许因为翻台率高而增多的人数可以compensate for每拨客人较少的花费,这样的话,最终有可能sales (profits) rise, 对原文是support而不是weaken了。
|
|