ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sdcar2010
打印 上一主题 下一主题

SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(二)More about Argument Components

[精华]   [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2011-7-2 03:45:06 | 只看该作者
Very well written in English, It's especially good for solving problems such as bold face type.  I love the middle part of your post - The hidden Premise!
Ding!
22#
发表于 2011-7-2 12:22:08 | 只看该作者
u r awesome!!!
23#
发表于 2011-7-2 15:27:52 | 只看该作者
LZ还是某日出个中文版吧…………  要是理解错了可咋办= =+
24#
发表于 2011-7-9 23:05:14 | 只看该作者
一战看过一遍。。2战再看一遍!!
25#
发表于 2011-7-10 13:24:14 | 只看该作者
fantactic!!!
26#
发表于 2011-7-10 22:05:21 | 只看该作者
thx! it's really helpful~~~
27#
发表于 2011-7-17 22:37:53 | 只看该作者
LZ出本书来卖钱吧~~ 你太强了!
28#
发表于 2011-7-26 05:16:06 | 只看该作者
Keep in mind that you have to find the main conclusion of an argument in CR test. Do not be fooled by an intermediate conclusion along the way. Use the “because” test if in doubt.


---------------------------
sdcar2010, what do you mean of use the "because" to test  if in doubt?  

Do you mean to test out the "main conclusion" or "intermediate conclusion" by this method?

I am a little bit confused and have no idea how it can be done.

Look forward to your explanation, thanks!
29#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-26 06:17:50 | 只看该作者
Keep in mind that you have to find the main conclusion of an argument in CR test. Do not be fooled by an intermediate conclusion along the way. Use the “because” test if in doubt.


---------------------------
sdcar2010, what do you mean of use the "because" to test  if in doubt?  

Do you mean to test out the "main conclusion" or "intermediate conclusion" by this method?

I am a little bit confused and have no idea how it can be done.

Look forward to your explanation, thanks!
-- by 会员 helenlife (2011/7/26 5:16:06)


What if there is no indicator in the argument?

In case you cannot find an indicator for premise/conclusion, you have to understand what the aruthor is trying to say and ask yourself which part is the conclusion and which part is the premise to support the conclusion. Consider the following example:
Every milk product from Three Deers must be recalled. These products contains melamine which could lead to renal failure.

Which one is the conclusion? Which one is the premise? Most likely you would say that the 1st sentence is the conclusion and the 2nd sentence is the premise.
Every milk product from Three Deers must be recalled. These products contains melamine which could lead to renal failure.

If in doubt, 1) simply connect the two sentences using the word because; and 2) see which one of the resulting arguments makes more sense:
1) Every milk product from Three Deers must be recalled because these products contains melamine which could lead to renal failure.
2) Becasue every milk product from Three Deers must be recalled, these products contains melamine which could lead to renal failure.

In CR test, if you can locate the premise and the conclusion of an argument, you have 50% chance of getting the right answer in the end. Train your eyes and brains to identify the conclusion of an argument quickly and precisely. Make sure your first step of a long march to the victory gets off on the right foot.
30#
发表于 2011-7-27 19:39:17 | 只看该作者
都是强人!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 03:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部