SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】（一）Arguments

maixt

好贴！~

killuaanna

支持支持 顶起来好好学习！！！

wupenghui2000

三鹿表示不蛋定了~

zhenltian84

我觉得这个东东比lawyer好，因为我属于那种对逻辑都还没有入门的，必须从根本上去了解逻辑。lawyer的方法可能对那种高级选手是直接受用的，对我这种菜鸟就不怎么奏效了。

小蓊

For questions, such as "Which of the following can properly be inferred regarding the past above?" or "Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?", how can we analyse an argument that without a conclusion?

sdcar2010

For the first question, it does not matter if there is a conclusion. More often than not, the passage just lists several facts or statements. Then the question stem (as you pointed out) simply ask for which of the following answer must be true based on the passage.

For the second question, the passage is most likely a few formal logic type of statement. So you have to treat the statements as premise or background info or evidence, then come up with a main conclusion.

For questions, such as "Which of the following can properly be inferred regarding the past above?" or "Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?", how can we analyse an argument that without a conclusion?

-- by 会员 小蓊 (2011/8/7 14:10:43)

宇翼深蓝

好东西啊。。。对CR我是半点都没办法。。。

maotingting

顶

ivonfyq

太及时了，我现在全考感觉做题，正确率只有一半，希望看完你的文章能让我大受启发，谢谢！

gaoliufu

顶起来，比那些做题技巧管用多了