我认为这个历史学家不是简单的同意传统观点或者新观点,而是有综合了二者的新看法,否则他干吗说 A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. ?这里的more cautious conclusion是旧观点吗?我认为不是
当然楼上各位说的D我认为也有一定的道理,我只是觉得有必要认真的讨论一下C
作者似乎隐含了自己的结论在后面的讨论中。Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented. 这句就能判断作者一定是支持旧观点吗?
A:The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends, 错
B:同A
C:The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends;,不是中间结论
D:正确
E: the second is further information that substantiates that evidence.,不是支持的,是相反观点的支持
C:The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends;,不是中间结论
C:The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends;,不是中间结论
The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.
你仔细看看 to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; overall position 就是最后的position c 明显是对立的 intermediate 没有关系