ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: viovio1989
打印 上一主题 下一主题

700...我还重考吗。。。谁来告诉我。。。

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2011-5-28 12:58:59 | 只看该作者
我要是你就不考,早高兴得去吃火锅了。。。。prep630的进。。。。
22#
发表于 2011-5-28 21:41:20 | 只看该作者
我要是你我也绝对不考了,这已经是10%的成绩了
23#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-30 10:01:12 | 只看该作者
其实Prep没有什么参考价值。。。只要考试心态好就能考好,我深有体会,就觉得其实考前成绩都是假的,只要当时发挥好就行,我就是太紧张才悲催了
24#
发表于 2011-5-30 10:07:38 | 只看该作者
如果lz想申请top15的 mba program还是重考吧

俺Prep模考一次 730,一次760,在模考前没看过prep语法笔记,没做过真题,只做过2变og,看了一遍manhattan,而且模考的 2次数学还都不是满分
结果实战才720,不甘心啊,报了一个月后的二战,加油吧!

这是国外的mba论坛上的一个信息,你可以参考一下
I've seen this statement made repeatedly on both this and the business week forums; however, I have never seen any evidence to support it. Further, an analysis done by rhyme (http://gmatclub.com/forum/103-t34770?hilit=Kellogg+GMAT+yield) based on the acceptance rates by GMAT score provided by Kellogg (the only such provided data I know of) using a conservative estimate of yield by GMAT score gave the following acceptance rates:

640: 10%
650-690: 22%
700-740: 32%
750-800: 42%

Using a less conservative estimate the acceptance rates were calculated as:

640: 7%
650-690: 17%
700-740: 34%
750-800: 52%

While clearly a jumbo GMAT score is not a guarantee for admission, there is a clear, linear benefit to higher GMAT scores all the way up to the highest values.

Whether or not this is the way it should be is for another discussion; however, I think we owe it to other prospectives to put this misinformation to rest.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-17 02:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部