Most insomnia is not an illness or a physical condition so much as a symptom of another problem that may simply be a reaction to certain medications, anxiety about travel, or stress before a job interview.
- an illness or a physical condition so much as a symptom of another problem that may simply be a reaction to certain medications
- an illness or a physical condition so much as symptomatic of another problem that may be a simple one, like a reaction caused by certain medications
- so much an illness or a physical condition but a symptom of another problem that may be as simple as when certain medications cause a reaction
- so much an illness or a physical condition, but it is a symptom of another problem, maybe a simple one like certain medications causing a reaction
- so much an illness or a physical condition but symptomatic of another problem, maybe simply a reaction to certain medications
E错,原因:
1.不平行。明明有symptom做n.与condition平行,ETS决不会用一个a.去做正确选项,否则就是自己打自己嘴巴子。OG204,虽然partly to do和partly because在我们看来不是最完美的平行,但它至少还有partly是平行的,而且ETS在解释这道题的时候,也强调了in part和partly不平行,以此作为排除错误选项的依据。据此,我们可以看出平行是不可违背的。然而E,却是看不到一点平行的影子,这样的选项,怎么可能被ETS当作正确选项???
2.maybe ... 对another problem起非限定性修饰作用,我不明白为什么众多NN认为这是符合逻辑的在握看来,非限定性的修饰才恰恰是不符合逻辑意思的非限定性,那意思不就是“所有的problem都是reaction, anxiety, or stress”??这显然不对啊,应该是“特定的一些problem才是reaction, anxiety, or stress”吧。这里“another problem, maybe a reaction to certain medications, anxiety about travel, or stress before a job interview”的错误,我觉得很像OG220的D选项“a hundred years, a period beginning in 1788”的错误(a hundred years is defined as a period beginning in 1788),用在这里就是another problem is defined as maybe ...
3.
以下是引用rt316在2004-6-13 3:05:00的发言:另外,还想补充一下,关于限定性定从的修饰,我在一开始选择的时候也的确没有注意,但现在看来,这是一个大问题。从逻辑上讲,a reaction / anxiety / stress是并列的,但是,限定性定从的介入使得短语的平行发生混乱,有其他两种解释:A-a symptom / anxiety / stress平行;B-problem / anxiety / stress平行。所以,我现在觉得,还是E更合适一点。 按照你的理解,E同样可以看成是problem /anxiety /stress平行,同样不对。我觉得这个不是这题的考点,你这种理解有点鸡蛋里挑骨头的感觉 |