why warwick can't compete with US top 50? could you give some reason instead of saying tulane for sure?
FYI, another set of data (figure collected by a warwick student):
72 - Oxford (16.2% of the entire spring intern class so far across all banks) 66 - Cambridge (14.9%) 59 - LSE (13.3%) 57 - Warwick (12.9%) 40 - UCL (9%) 27 - Imperial (6.1%)
i'm really wondering how many tulane students got in to big banks
why warwick can't compete with US top 50? could you give some reason instead of saying tulane for sure?
FYI, another set of data (figure collected by a warwick student):
72 - Oxford (16.2% of the entire spring intern class so far across all banks) 66 - Cambridge (14.9%) 59 - LSE (13.3%) 57 - Warwick (12.9%) 40 - UCL (9%) 27 - Imperial (6.1%)
i'm really wondering how many tulane students got in to big banks
why warwick can't compete with US top 50? could you give some reason instead of saying tulane for sure?
FYI, another set of data (figure collected by a warwick student):
72 - Oxford (16.2% of the entire spring intern class so far across all banks) 66 - Cambridge (14.9%) 59 - LSE (13.3%) 57 - Warwick (12.9%) 40 - UCL (9%) 27 - Imperial (6.1%)
i'm really wondering how many tulane students got in to big banks
-- by 会员 incredible88 (2011/5/10 16:08:25)
把你找的企业名称和地点公布一下
-- by 会员 bestofme (2011/5/10 19:12:32)
the data is for UK banks and is from a TSR thread. from the context, i think it refers to all those big names. if you are curious about the details, you can go to TSR and ask the guy who posted this. share you the link bellow http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1611251