ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: webber89
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[录取汇报] 又是亘古不变的话题,msf求选校,美国40多名的商学院vs英国2个金融强校

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2011-5-10 07:40:28 | 只看该作者
不是说华威不好,而是华威有wbs,wms,其中wms非常水,并且wbs里有些其他专业也是很水很水,所以影响了整体声誉。华威应该还难以排上ibd的target school吧
-- by 会员 chx1989 (2011/5/8 19:01:58)







UBS去年的summer intern:

Oxford 21
Warwick 21
LSE 20
Cambridge 19
Imperial 18


如果warwick不算target school,我不知道什么算target school。。。


PS:数据来自英国人的论坛(TSR)
32#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-10 10:12:52 | 只看该作者
谢谢大家,我家长还是主张我去us,他们说钱贵一点,教育质量好点,杜兰前50的,金融也很有特色,可是我还是很想去华威的,因为他的门槛明显要高于很多美国top50了,大家再帮我说说
33#
发表于 2011-5-10 10:20:19 | 只看该作者
谢谢大家,我家长还是主张我去us,他们说钱贵一点,教育质量好点,杜兰前50的,金融也很有特色,可是我还是很想去华威的,因为他的门槛明显要高于很多美国top50了,大家再帮我说说
-- by 会员 webber89 (2011/5/10 10:12:52)




美国好点吧
34#
发表于 2011-5-10 10:59:04 | 只看该作者
什么时候钱贵一点就代表教育质量好一点了?你不如关注下tulane和warwick哪个录取难度更大一些,这还是能说明问题的,至于回国我真的觉得差不多。。。
35#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-10 11:44:05 | 只看该作者
大家貌似都很不看好曼大么,这是因为啥啊
36#
发表于 2011-5-10 11:52:48 | 只看该作者
tulane for sure,美国前50的,warwick比不上
37#
发表于 2011-5-10 16:08:25 | 只看该作者
why warwick can't compete with US top 50? could you give some reason instead of saying tulane for sure?

FYI, another set of data (figure collected by a warwick student):

72 - Oxford (16.2% of the entire spring intern class so far across all banks)
66 - Cambridge (14.9%)
59 - LSE (13.3%)
57 - Warwick (12.9%)
40 - UCL (9%)
27 - Imperial (6.1%)

i'm really wondering how many tulane students got in to big banks
38#
发表于 2011-5-10 19:12:32 | 只看该作者
why warwick can't compete with US top 50? could you give some reason instead of saying tulane for sure?

FYI, another set of data (figure collected by a warwick student):

72 - Oxford (16.2% of the entire spring intern class so far across all banks)
66 - Cambridge (14.9%)
59 - LSE (13.3%)
57 - Warwick (12.9%)
40 - UCL (9%)
27 - Imperial (6.1%)

i'm really wondering how many tulane students got in to big banks
-- by 会员 incredible88 (2011/5/10 16:08:25)




把你找的企业名称和地点公布一下
39#
发表于 2011-5-10 19:27:58 | 只看该作者
why warwick can't compete with US top 50? could you give some reason instead of saying tulane for sure?

FYI, another set of data (figure collected by a warwick student):

72 - Oxford (16.2% of the entire spring intern class so far across all banks)
66 - Cambridge (14.9%)
59 - LSE (13.3%)
57 - Warwick (12.9%)
40 - UCL (9%)
27 - Imperial (6.1%)

i'm really wondering how many tulane students got in to big banks
-- by 会员 incredible88 (2011/5/10 16:08:25)






把你找的企业名称和地点公布一下
-- by 会员 bestofme (2011/5/10 19:12:32)




the data is for UK banks and is from a TSR thread. from the context, i think it refers to all those big names. if you are curious about the details, you can go to TSR and ask the guy who posted this. share you the link bellow
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1611251
40#
发表于 2011-5-10 19:35:30 | 只看该作者
这是英国人的数据,针对英国人而言,统计下tulane的数据,针对美国人,照样很鲜艳,关键是回国怎样,国内hr对于英国非g5有很大偏见,你可以来上海问问各个hr
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

NTU MBA

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-10 08:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部