时序性因果攻击false causal explanation / time difference The author commits a typical “after this, therefore, because of this” fallacy based on mere proximity of time.
The only evidence offered in this argument to support the implicit causal claim is that A preceded B; therefore, the former event caused the latter one.
Plausible as the causal connection is, further possible causal explanations must be considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C.
As a result, any decision aimed at addressing the causal relationship of two events must be based on a thorough investigation bypinpointing the actual cause of B.