ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2068|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

水权 63 问题求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-26 08:58:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
这篇文章, 深恶痛绝,
63题
原文是:
This pragmatic approach is buttressed by Arizona v. California (1963), wherein the Supreme Court indicated that the manner in which any type of federal reservation is created does not affect the application to it of the Winters doctrine.Therefore, the reserved water rights of Pueblo Indians have priority over other citizens’ water rights as of 1848, the year in which pueblos must be considered to have become reservations.

63. The passage suggests that the legal rights of citizens other than American Indians to the use of water fl owing into the Rio Grande pueblos are
(A) guaranteed by the precedent set in Arizona v. California
(B) abolished by the Winters doctrine
(C) deferred to the Pueblo Indians whenever treaties explicitly require this
(D) guaranteed by federal land-use laws
(E) limited by the prior claims of the Pueblo Indians

我都原文的时候觉得,只是时间上 印第安人比其他居民早获得水权。 priority 不仅有优先的意思,还有时间在前面的意思。这个地方给的答案,E, 我觉得有些突兀。

我错哪里了??
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-27 11:30:27 | 只看该作者
原句的意思是,从pueblos开始被视为保留地的1848年开始,pueblo indians就比其他居民有用水的优先权了。所以其他居民相比indians就是Limited了
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-27 13:27:57 | 只看该作者
恩, 谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-26 22:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部