- UID
- 422655
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-2-25
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
这篇文章, 深恶痛绝, 63题 原文是: This pragmatic approach is buttressed by Arizona v. California (1963), wherein the Supreme Court indicated that the manner in which any type of federal reservation is created does not affect the application to it of the Winters doctrine.Therefore, the reserved water rights of Pueblo Indians have priority over other citizens’ water rights as of 1848, the year in which pueblos must be considered to have become reservations.
63. The passage suggests that the legal rights of citizens other than American Indians to the use of water fl owing into the Rio Grande pueblos are (A) guaranteed by the precedent set in Arizona v. California (B) abolished by the Winters doctrine (C) deferred to the Pueblo Indians whenever treaties explicitly require this (D) guaranteed by federal land-use laws (E) limited by the prior claims of the Pueblo Indians
我都原文的时候觉得,只是时间上 印第安人比其他居民早获得水权。 priority 不仅有优先的意思,还有时间在前面的意思。这个地方给的答案,E, 我觉得有些突兀。
我错哪里了?? |
|