ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: zcoygmat
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教GWD最新试题4第4题

[复制链接]
71#
发表于 2005-7-8 17:05:00 | 只看该作者

i vote for c.


in D, what是charge的宾语,charge后面应该跟一个"钱数",for example,3 dollars. 要用也应该用how much才跟准确,如果是price of what another product with the same active ingredient,还有点道理.


应该是c跟准确.

72#
发表于 2005-8-3 22:43:00 | 只看该作者

支持C,charge sth.(price) for sth.(商品),插入语不影响that引导限定性定从的使用

D错,of what唯一合理的理解是what表示商品,这样the price of what是一个整体,the drug's maker charges for ... 做定从修饰该整体,语法上讲得通,但是逻辑上有问题:what指代什么??

1)what指代后面的another product:

这样就产生了wordy的问题,charge for已经表明了price的所属,前面再加一个(the price) of what重复

2)what指代其他的东东(非句中的another product):

the drug's maker charges for ... 引导的定从的修饰对象是price,而不是what,对what起不了解释说明的作用,所以what显然does not make sense,应该换成其他的具体商品的名称,比如说anaesthetic。

但这样还是意思不好。不妨假设这里的another product是heroin,带入句中,就变成了the price of anaesthetics the drug's maker charges for heroins。到底是“毒品制造商就海洛因而索要的麻醉剂的价格”呢?还是“毒品制造商就海洛因而索要的价格”呢??显然后者的意思清楚,前者根本就是不知所云

E错,charge sth.(商品) at sth.(price)对,但是charge for sth.(商品) at sth.(price)就不对了,而此题选E的话,正是用了后一种表达。所以这些用法一定不能混淆

综上所述:

本题肯定选C,强烈建议版主把答案改过来!!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-3 22:46:20编辑过]
73#
发表于 2005-8-4 21:20:00 | 只看该作者

支持,答案也不用改了,就是不要再回复帖子了,不要回下去又没完没了地谈论了。

74#
发表于 2005-9-14 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

以下是可以支持选d的例子,搜一下很多

The timber that was sold by competitive bidding went for something like three times or four times the price of what was sold at the appraised price and went just to the parties that had the checkerboard.

enjoy coming to Thailand but cannot see my self coming to Pattaya again. I am simply sick and tired of having to pay 3-4 times the price of what Thai nationals pay.



Restaurants will often charge between two to five times the price of what a wine merchant may ask for an exceptional vintage.



there is broadband access but at three times the price of what it costs in Dublin.


75#
发表于 2005-9-20 16:21:00 | 只看该作者
hehe,热闹热闹,还是相信存在即合理,D。
76#
发表于 2005-9-25 03:06:00 | 只看该作者

支持C。


今天做到一道逻辑题目:突然想到可能对这题有帮助


请参考gwd-5-Q29中的选项D


Because of lower advertising costs, stores are able to offer their own brands of cereals at significantly lower prices than those charged for name-brand cereals.


77#
发表于 2005-9-25 18:29:00 | 只看该作者

sorry, I don't know how to delete my response.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-25 18:32:59编辑过]
78#
发表于 2005-9-29 18:43:00 | 只看该作者

c is right,


drug is being sold for three times the price that the drug's maker charges for another poduct with the same active ingredient,

79#
发表于 2005-10-2 22:23:00 | 只看该作者
C
80#
发表于 2005-10-4 21:06:00 | 只看该作者

恩???如果选C的话,请告诉我这个结构中的of能够省略么!???


this book is three times the length of that one。


请选C的牛牛解答一下?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 19:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部