ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9483|回复: 21
打印 上一主题 下一主题

询问OG24两题!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-3 13:14:00 | 只看该作者

询问OG24两题!

During the 1960’s and 1970’s, the primary economic development strategy of local governments in the United States was to attract manufacturing industries. Unfortunately, this strategy was usually implemented at another community’s expense: many manufacturing facilities were lured away from their moorings elsewhere through tax incentives and slick promotional efforts. Through the transfer of jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town’s triumph could become another town’s tragedy.


In the 1980’s the strategy shifted from this zero-sum game (A situation in which a gain by one person or side must be matched by a loss by another person or side) to one called “high-technology development,” in which local governments competed to attract newly formed high-technology manufacturing firms. Although this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs, it also had its shortcomings: high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, and there simply are not enough high-tech firms to satisfy all geographic areas.


Recently, local governments have increasingly come to recognize the advantages of yet a third strategy: the promotion of homegrown small businesses. Small indigenous businesses are created by a nearly ubiquitous resource, local entrepreneurs. With roots in their communities, these individuals are less likely to be enticed away by incentives offered by another community. Indigenous industry and talent are kept at home, creating an environment that both provides jobs and fosters further entrepreneurship.


145. The passage suggests which of the following about the majority of United States manufacturing industries before the high-technology development era of the 1980’s?


(A) They lost many of their most innovative personnel to small entrepreneurial enterprises.


(B) They experienced a major decline in profits during the 1960’s and 1970’s.


(C) They could provide real economic benefits to the areas in which they were located.


(D) They employed workers who had no specialized skills.C


(E) They actively interfered with local entrepreneurial ventures.



.


148. The author of the passage mentions which of the following as an advantage of high-technology development?


(A) It encourages the modernization of existing manufacturing facilities.


(B) It promotes healthy competition between rival industries.


(C) It encourages the growth of related industries.


(D) It takes full advantage of the existing workforce.E


(E) It does not advantage one local workforce at the expense of another.


请问第一个策略有什么不好?145为什么是real economic benefits?


还有148E选项什么意思?谢谢赐教


沙发
发表于 2004-6-3 23:19:00 | 只看该作者

145.Through the transfer of jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town’s triumph could become another town’s tragedy.

jobs and related revenues 都是real economic benefits.

请问第一个策略有什么不好?

Unfortunately, this strategy was usually implemented at another community’s expense.

148的E是就是2策略没有了策略1的不好.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-3 23:50:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢,那E选项怎么翻译呢,谢谢!
地板
发表于 2004-6-4 01:03:00 | 只看该作者

它没有以expense of another的代价来advantage one local workforce.

5#
发表于 2004-7-27 12:46:00 | 只看该作者

再问148T. 它没有以expense of another的代价来advantage one local workforce.我也知道应该是这个意思, 可就是不明白这里的victimizing是什么意思?

“preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs”

不明白, victimizing不是牺牲, 使受害的意思吗? 使其它地区受害呀, 不知道这个否定词是怎么来得?

6#
发表于 2004-7-28 03:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cocoabean在2004-7-27 12:46:00的发言:

再问148T. 它没有以expense of another的代价来advantage one local workforce.我也知道应该是这个意思, 可就是不明白这里的victimizing是什么意思?


“preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs”


不明白, victimizing不是牺牲, 使受害的意思吗? 使其它地区受害呀, 不知道这个否定词是怎么来得?


this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs,

这里是说胜过, 优于victimizing.......

7#
发表于 2004-7-29 08:18:00 | 只看该作者
E,就是不损人利己
8#
发表于 2004-8-28 23:34:00 | 只看该作者

我对148E也有疑问

我觉得关键是LOCAL,LOCAL是指当地的,那也就是说E的意思是,HIGH-TECHNOLOGY 没有ADVANTAGE当地的一个WORK FORCE 而损害另一 个WORK FORCE,可是文章中的意思应该是指,两个不同地区的WORK FORCE。

9#
发表于 2005-4-26 21:16:00 | 只看该作者
Although this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs

这话怎么理解呢?没有看明白。
10#
发表于 2005-4-29 12:19:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用vincent0330在2004-7-28 3:51:00的发言:


this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs,

这里是说胜过, 优于victimizing.......


同意。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-29 18:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部