ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6817|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

5/63-T9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-3 10:05:00 | 只看该作者

5/63-T9

How many really suffer as a result of labor market problems?(提出问题:多少人受到职业市场的影响)This is one of the most critical yet contentious contentious causing a lot of argument and disagreement between peoplesocial policy questions. In many ways, our social statistics exaggerate the degree of hardship. Unemployment does not have the same dire consequences today as it did in the 1930’s when most of the unemployed were primary breadwinners, when income and earnings were usually much closer to the margin of subsistencesubsistence the condition of only just having enough money or food to stay alive, and when there were no countervailing with an equally strong but opposite effect social programs for those failing in the labor market. Increasing affluence, the rise of families with more than one wage earner, the growing predominance of secondary earners among the unemployed, and improved social welfare protection have unquestionably mitigated the consequences of joblessness. (社会数据夸大了困难程度,以当今与1930对比)Earnings and income data also overstate the dimensions of hardship.(收入数据也夸大了困难程度) Among the millions with hourly earnings at or below the minimum wage level, the overwhelming majority are from multiple-earner, relatively affluent families. Most of those counted by the poverty statistics are elderly or handicapped or have family responsibilities which keep them out of the labor force, so the poverty statistics are by no means an accurate indicator of labor market pathologies.提出问题:提出问题:多少人受到职业市场的影响。论据一:社会数据和收入数据夸大了困难程度,由当今与1930年对比。



Yet there are also many ways our social statistics underestimate the degree of labor-market-related hardship. The unemployment counts exclude the millions of fully employed workers whose wages are so low that their families remain in poverty. Low wages and repeated or prolonged unemployment frequently interact to undermine the capacity for self-support. Since the number experiencing joblessness at some time during the year is several times the number unemployed in any month, those who suffer as a result of forced idleness can equal or exceed average annual unemployment, even though only a minority of the jobless in any month really suffer. For every person counted in the monthly unemployment tallies, there is another working part-time because of the inability to find full-time work, or else outside the labor force but wanting a job. Finally, income transfers in our country have always focused on the elderly, disabled, and dependent, neglecting the needs of the working poor, so that the dramatic expansion of cash and in-kind transfers does not necessarily mean that those failing in the labor market are adequately protected.论据二:社会数据低估了困难。低收入者,多次失业者,零时工、劳动穷人



As a result of such contradictory evidence, it is uncertain whether those suffering seriously as a result of labor market problems number in the hundreds of thousands or the tens of millions, and, hence, whether high levels of joblessness can be tolerated or must be countered by job creation and economic stimulus. There is only one area of agreement in this debate—that the existing poverty, employment, and earnings statistics are inadequate for one their primary applications, measuring the consequences of labor market problems.结论:数据不足以反映劳动市场的困难。



9.     Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the author’s argument concerning why poverty statistics cannot properly be used to show the effects of problems in the labor market?这题花了2分18秒,做错了,选了C,削弱题


(A)   A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty can indicate a shortage of jobs because the basic number of those unable to accept employment remains approximately constant.


As a result of such contradictory evidence, it is uncertain whether those suffering seriously as a result of labor market problems number in the hundreds of thousands or the tens of millions, and, hence, whether high levels of joblessness can be tolerated or must be countered by job creation and economic stimulus.


(B) For those who are in poverty as a result of joblessness, there are social programs available that provide a minimum standard of living.


(C) Poverty statistics do not consistently agree with earnings statistics, when each is taken as a measure of hardship resulting from unemployment.


(D) The elderly and handicapped categories include many who previously were employed in the labor market.A


(E) Since the labor market is global in nature, poor workers in one country are competing with poor workers in another with respect to the level of wages and the existence of jobs.



作者的观点是如下吗


As a result of such contradictory evidence, it is uncertain whether those suffering seriously as a result of labor market problems number in the hundreds of thousands or the tens of millions, and, hence, whether high levels of joblessness can be tolerated or must be countered by job creation and economic stimulus.



A为何是反对作者的观点呢  真的是不明白



谢谢

沙发
发表于 2004-6-4 00:19:00 | 只看该作者

这道题我也困惑了很长时间,今天终于有点眉目了,大家继续讨论!


全文论证关系如下


论据一:社会数据和收入数据夸大了困难程度,由当今与1930年对比。



论据二:社会数据低估了困难。



As a result of such contradictory evidence(基于上述两个evidence,都是统计不准确),得出中间结论:没确定those suffering seriously as a result of labor market problems的人数.>>> 最终结论:existing poverty statistics are inadequate.



对于本题的削弱方法: 1, 2个论据削弱,指出survey1,没有夸大, survey2,没有的低估.


                   2,对于中间结论削弱,指出可以确定这些人的数量.


A,说了可以确定这些人数


其他选项现在看,发现是无关选项,


大家继续讨论


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-4 10:59:13编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-4 05:48:00 | 只看该作者
非常感谢fair_sword  这道题今天终于明白了
地板
发表于 2006-10-8 22:15:00 | 只看该作者

哈 這題我也做錯 不過後來發現我應該是定位錯了

應該要定位再第一段

Most of those counted by the poverty statistics are elderly or     

handicapped or have family responsibilities which keep them out

of the labor force, so the poverty statistics are by no means

an accurate indicator of labor market pathologies病狀.

 

(A) A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty can indicate a shortage of jobs because the basic number of those unable to accept employment remains approximately constant.

    原文說
            
那些貧窮數據裡面的人
            
都是老人或是殘障者
            
所以不能代表勞力市場的問題
            
問反駁

   
            
如果短期貧窮人口數字上漲的話還是可以視為是工作短缺
            
因為那些不能工作的人的數字
            
是一樣的

大家在討論討論

5#
发表于 2007-2-15 15:37:00 | 只看该作者
agree with autumn713
6#
发表于 2007-4-2 14:59:00 | 只看该作者

各位讲的好深奥啊,没怎么看懂。。。

9说,作者认为poverty statistics不能用来表现劳动力市场问题,反驳作者的观点,只要证明poverty statistics可以表现劳动力市场的问题就可以了。

A里面讲,A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty can indicate a shortage of jobs because the basic number of those unable to accept employment remains approximately constant.如果那些失业者的基本数量是稳定的,那么短期贫穷人口的增加就表明工作的短缺。短期是相对于basic number 而言的,如果是长期的变化,basic number 肯定不是稳定的。

poverty statistics可以认为就是A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty ,是可以统计出来的数据。a shortage of jobs 就是劳动力市场问题。

如果A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty can indicate a shortage of jobs ,就可以证明poverty statistics可以表现劳动力市场的问题。

条件已经假设失业者基本数量稳定,那么工作短缺当然会导致一部分人失业,贫穷人口就增加啦。

不知道讲清楚没,欢迎讨论QQ:25810184

7#
发表于 2007-5-27 15:52:00 | 只看该作者

解释得真好,谢谢!

8#
发表于 2007-6-16 22:55:00 | 只看该作者
autumn713才是正解,谢谢!
9#
发表于 2007-11-2 02:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用autumn713在2006-10-8 22:15:00的发言:

哈 這題我也做錯 不過後來發現我應該是定位錯了

應該要定位再第一段

Most of those counted by the poverty statistics are elderly or     

handicapped or have family responsibilities which keep them out

of the labor force, so the poverty statistics are by no means

an accurate indicator of labor market pathologies病狀.

(A) A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty can indicate a shortage of jobs because the basic number of those unable to accept employment remains approximately constant.

    原文說
   
那些貧窮數據裡面的人
   
都是老人或是殘障者
   
所以不能代表勞力市場的問題
   
問反駁

   
   
如果短期貧窮人口數字上漲的話還是可以視為是工作短缺
   
因為那些不能工作的人的數字
   
是一樣的

大家在討論討論

太正确了。

这题我选对了,但说实话没有定位到A的位置,我用的是排除。我觉得本题用排除法适合像我一样记忆力不太好难以定位的同学。在这里推销一下,如有误导请多见谅。

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the author’s argument concerning why poverty statistics cannot properly be used to show
                the effects of problems in the labor market?

 

(A) A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty
            can
            indicate a shortage of jobs because the basic number of those unable to accept employment remains approximately constant.

首先本题是要反对作者的观点,作者的观点是对poverty stat.的一个反观点,那么和poverty有关的正观点就有可能是正选。正确选项的特点就是同义词替换,poverty stat=number of those in poverty,show=indicate,且前面是正面描述can,后面有个constant(说实话我当时没有读懂这句得意思,呵呵),先放着不动。

 

(B) For those who are in poverty as a result of joblessness, there are social programs available that provide a minimum standard of living.

 

如果这个观点成立,只能说明poverty statistics是不可靠的,作者的观点就是强调这些数据是不可靠的不能反应出实际情况。所以这个选项肯定不能反驳作者的观点。

 

(C) Poverty statistics do not consistently agree with earnings statistics, when each is taken as a measure of hardship resulting from unemployment.

 

说的是povertyearnings两种数据的关系,管不了那么多,反正是数据不一致,顶多是助作者为虐,不多看了。

 

(D) The elderly and handicapped categories include many who previously were employed in the labor market.

 

我在这个选项上犹豫了一下。说得还是数据不准确,前后有出入嘛。

 

(E) Since the labor market is global in nature, poor workers in one country are competing with poor workers in another with respect to the level of wages and the existence of jobs.

 

都说到global去了,全文没有谈那么多,走远了。没有提到一个关键词。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-2 2:46:29编辑过]
10#
发表于 2008-6-21 22:25:00 | 只看该作者

说的不错, 顶

我也选了C, 但现在我觉得C是加强

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-30 14:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部