- UID
- 76899
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2005-2-23
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
As to your CCP analogy, I have to say, "Yes, I do." But this response is based on my knowledge of its dirty past. But you see, the point is that many people do not have this "common sense". They just blindly accept whatever the media say. Such people as my in-laws are still nostalgic about Mao's era, although they suffered badly then.
As to gap (2), it really depends on your interpretation of the words such as effectiveness and loyal. At least for me, they are rather vague.
A bit overanalysing, perhaps you are right. But if there is no C, you may well considering giving them a try. Of course, in the real exam, the examinee should instinctively respond to look for choices containing a normative principle. After all, the stimulus argument, generally speaking, is about inferring a normative statement from a series of factual statements. Thus, the most distinct gap exists between is and ought to be.
As to extreme, I don't know what your dictionary says about it. But for me, its core meaning is still about degree instead of quality. Perhaps, you can give me a borderline case of it. Moreover, you can't just exclude a choice on the ground that it contains absolute terms. Though I can't give you any example right now, I did meet the key with absolute terms in it. |
|