ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: chadrer
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 阅读 RC 第12篇 57 - 63 膜拜印第安水权!

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2011-9-10 00:20:41 | 只看该作者
感谢楼主发这个帖子~~ 晚上做完这一篇心哗啦啦地碎了一地~ 7个才对了两个~ 而且继续看半天还是看不懂。。。原来是极品文章~ 心理安慰大大大的~
32#
发表于 2011-9-13 18:58:44 | 只看该作者
看完文章一读问题大脑一片空白。。。真是极品文哪,感谢楼主~
33#
发表于 2011-9-14 05:30:35 | 只看该作者
我昨晚做了这个,第一遍看完根本不想做题,接着看第二遍才做题,结果几乎全错,看了四五遍还是晕
34#
发表于 2011-10-15 18:38:54 | 只看该作者
分析了N次了,还是有点云里雾里。。。用个水真是麻烦。。。
35#
发表于 2011-10-18 05:12:16 | 只看该作者
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winters_v._United_States

希望有些帮助!

"Winters Rights"

Winter Rights are in many cases referred to as "reserved water rights". This name is derived from the United States Supreme Court case Winter v. United States, and deals with the effects that the case had on American Indian water rights. The Winters Rights established several things in relation to American Indian water rights.

Firstly, Winters Rights declares that they are defined by the federal government and federal law which controls them.

Next, Winters Rights states that when an American Indian reservation is established by either a treaty, statute, or executive order, implied reservation of water rights is included in said treaty, statute, or executive order. These water rights apply to water sources that are either within the reservation or bordering it.

Winters Rights then states that the water rights are reserved as soon as the portion of the American Indian reservation cases where competing users of the water source have prior appropriation dates of said water source, they will take precedence over the American Indian rights. Only those with prior appropriation dates take precedence, those with later dates are subordinate to the American Indian reservation in question.

In most cases, it is found that American Indian tribes do in general have senior priority dates for quantities of surface water than competing settlements. Winters Rights then stated that the amount of water which would be reserved for the use of an American Indian tribe would be equal to the amount of water that would sufficiently irrigate all of the irrigable acreage within the reservation.

In some cases this part of the Winter Rights is changed to include not only agricultural purposes for water use, but for all purposes of the American Indian reservation. An example of this would be a document from the Bureau of Indian Affairs breaks down what they believe to be the estimated water requirements of all different American Indian reservations, including the Fort Belknap American Indian reservation in Montana.

This document states that the Fort Belknap American Indian reservation will need water for uses such as recreation, wildlife, forestry, energy, minerals, industrial use, domestic use, and agricultural use. This uses are listed in ascending order of the amount of water it is estimated each use will need. It is also said that Winters Rights are not lost by an American Indian reservation's lack of use of the water. The Winters Rights will apply to the reservation if and when the reservation is not using their full portion of water. The Winters Rights include the idea that while treaties which were made in the creation of American Indian reservations did not specifically grant water rights, there was an implied reservation of the water rights which were not granted.
36#
发表于 2012-2-7 12:02:36 | 只看该作者
感谢LZ...这篇烦死人的文章!!!
37#
发表于 2012-2-24 16:59:41 | 只看该作者
知音啊,我昨晚做了,全部错光。做完完全down到谷底,原来这么多天涯沦落人啊。共勉之~
38#
发表于 2012-3-2 11:17:43 | 只看该作者
被这题折磨了3个小时(由于不理解,看不下去,总分神)
39#
发表于 2012-5-9 22:03:15 | 只看该作者
做完这篇 错了5个
按照平时的方法分析一遍之后发现 还是不懂 然后就看了lpi的解析 还是不懂 于是我就一字一字的看 遇到稍微模糊的单词就查词典 看是否有其他释义 结果还是看不懂 于是我就颠狂了 冲出自修室 买了一堆零食 飞快的吞咽 以平复我内心的烦躁 然后再回去接着看 可是还是看不懂。。。都要绝望了
看到大家的状态 总算有点安慰。。。。。
40#
发表于 2012-5-9 22:35:15 | 只看该作者
第一遍没看进去,第二遍看完错了5题,第三遍还是云里雾里,晕死我了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-8 08:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部