OG-63 没有人讨论过这题?

horsefish

Hi MIndfree, 见到你在网上, 想问问这个题的OG解释选项D

OG解释:The argument is consistent with managers at all levels using intuition in the minority of decisions made. Thus, choices D is inappropriate.

这么理解对否:这个选项其实是out of scope, 所以不是assumption.谢谢!!!

OG 63

Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-step has been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making, However, a recent study found that top manages used intuition significantly more that did most middle-or lower-level managers. This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective that careful, methodical reasoning.

A.      Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making many real-life management decisions.

B.      Top managers have ability to use either intuitive reasoning or methodical, step-by-step reasoning making decisions.

C.      The decisions made by middle-and lower-level managers can be made as easily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning

D.     Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of their decisions.

E.      Top managers are more effective at decision-making than middle-or lower-level managers

E是答案

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-20 23:05:23编辑过]

mindfree

I am not sure whether it is out of scope. It is not very clear cut in this question. I only ask myself "does the top managers have to use ...in majority of their decisions?" If not, D is not correct.

horsefish

谢谢MINDFREE.

(我的mind就是固定的, )

colleen

Using bridge relationship, you will believe e is correct.

KATIEUS

TO ALL THE FIRENDS WHO HAVE PROBLEMS  WITH D

本题FOCUS ON EFFETIVE DECISIONS

NOT ON THE PROPORTION OF TIME 。

amorela

顶顶.

mucully

个人理解，NN们指正：

A（事实）:比起MIDDLE.LOW经理，TOP经理用INTUITION更多
B（推论）：INTUITION优于METHODICAL
假设：TOP经理的决策优于MIDDLE LOW经理（TOP只是官衔大，跟决策优劣无关。昏君是皇上，但决策都是昏的（劣）的。)

D选项：强调TOP经理用INTUITION做大部分决策，但没有明确做的决策一定是优的，所以不选.(同“昏君”例子）

mucully

d选项个人理解：

D取非： Top managers use
intuitive reasoning in making the minority of their decisions.
conclusion：alternative view that intuition is actually more
effective than careful, methodical reasoning.

MINORITY和EFFECTIVE是俩概念，用的INTUITION次数少未必说明它不有效，有效的也未必就用的次数多（可能使用条件比较苛刻），所以两者是既不充分也不必要，谁也推不出来谁，无法WEAKEN。

这题我觉得是ETS考了一个思维误区：好的一定是多的。大概这里就是狒狒说的“白痴原则”，应该严格按照逻辑走。

菜鸟一枚，请指正。

mucully

d选项个人理解：

    

D取非： Top managers use
intuitive reasoning in making the minority of their decisions.

conclusion：alternative view that intuition is actually more
effective than careful, methodical reasoning.

        

MINORITY和EFFECTIVE是俩概念，用的INTUITION次数少未必说明它不有效，有效的也未必就用的次数多（可能使用条件比较苛刻），所以两者是既不充分也不必要，谁也推不出来谁，无法WEAKEN。

        

这题我觉得是ETS考了一个思维误区：好的一定是多的。大概这里就是狒狒说的“白痴原则”，应该严格按照逻辑走。

        

菜鸟一枚，请指正。

    

mucully

d选项个人理解：

                

D取非：minority of their decisions.

conclusion：
        alternative view that intuition is actually more
effective than careful, methodical reasoning.

            

MINORITY和EFFECTIVE是俩概念，用的INTUITION次数少未必说明它不有效，有效的也未必就用的次数多（可能使用条件比较苛刻），所以两者是既不充分也不必要，谁也推不出来谁，无法WEAKEN。

                

            这题我觉得是ETS考了一个思维误区：好的一定是多的。大概这里就是狒狒说的“白痴原则”，应该严格按照逻辑走。

                

            菜鸟一枚，请指正。

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-24 10:15:28编辑过]