ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3686|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

狒狒 关于seqingzazhi 的题 救命呀

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-16 21:28:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
75. Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating one sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.

(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.

(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew. (答案)

(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.

(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.



C 怎么就支持了呀 真是没弄懂 原文 到底 表明什么意思哦????牛牛们帮助



Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.

(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.

(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew. (答案)

(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.

(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.



C 怎么就支持了呀 真是没弄懂 原文 到底 表明什么意思哦????牛牛们帮助
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-16 22:14:47 | 只看该作者
这个题讲的是广告商在该报纸上撤出广告的事(我翻译不太好,将就着看)。
首先看你选的D。文中已知信息没有告诉我们人们对这两种报纸内容的喜好,这属于无关项。
A中说,广告商把广告转到了other family newspapers,这也是无关项,在已知信息中并没有说,只是说把广告撤了。
B.与文中意思反了,是WEAKEN.
E.无关。

通过上面的排除,可以得到C。我并不知道C为什么是支持它的,把其他明显的排了就得了。

这样分析不知对不对,静候其他NN的答案:)
板凳
发表于 2011-3-16 22:18:16 | 只看该作者
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
"广告商们认为如果继续在改版后的出版物上刊登广告,他们的商品销量将会增长;如果撤出则会导致商品销量下降。"而事实上他们撤出了,说明他们并没有考虑经济问题(撤出导致商品销量下降,利润必将减少),增强了文中的结论,“是出于道德上的考虑”。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-16 23:04:02 | 只看该作者
顶楼上  明白了 谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-5 06:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部