MAFN@Columbia 和 MSFM@Chicago，大家选哪个？

gnroses

有人力荐Chicago，原因是老牌金融强校，但不是特别理解他们的录取标准，是真的扩招了吗今年？不过他们的区域优势是很大的

Columbia光是本校就有MFE，MAFN，外加统计和OR，四个专业竞争类似职位

本来是很确定Columbia的，又有点纠结了。。。

蒙太奇

大哥。。你这讨论是专为我开的吗？

还是说你也有这个抉择？

gnroses

考虑到学校brand，项目质量，花费，项目时间

我的排序：Columbia大于Chicago约等于UIUC大于Fordham

-- by 会员 zjuer2007 (2011/3/14 12:27:55)

Chicago约等于UIUC？！

-- by 会员 PerduAnge (2011/3/14 12:40:34)

Agree. Chicago约等于UIUC.

-- by 会员 quasicrystal (2011/3/14 12:43:15)

这是什么情况？是chicago比想象的差，还是UIUC比想象的好？

请指点啊

maysnowfly

楼主，快点报背景吧，哥哥我等的望眼欲穿了欲穿了。。。
PS:蒙太奇兄又拿到芝大了么？

huanghao07

MAFN只有10个中国人？不只吧。。。

gnroses

报个BG，大家作参考
国内Top2 本科，物理出生，4年 W/E，G1500+，别的不值一提

gnroses

MAFN只有10个中国人？不只吧。。。

-- by 会员 huanghao07 (2011/3/14 12:50:47)

这个比较可靠，在读的同学证实过，除非今年扩招了。。。

youayou

Students with CSEE background get more benefit from UC because there are so many quant fund or prop trading firms in Chicago, which give extremely good compensation (require hard core programming/math skills at same time). Also The competition is significantly less in Chicago as well. But if you want to do quant in IB, Columbia is probably a better choice. Not sure about MAFN's placement. Know a guy working in my team as IT is from that program though (still good pay, 100K base + 50K sign-in bonus)

Other two programs are not comparable at all. Not sure how other guys get UC=UIUC but that is just bs, not even mention Fordham. Finance may be the industry that discriminate school brand most.

bluechip

友情帮顶~

AnttiZhang

Uchicago等于UIUC,
那么也是4个大陆人就业?2个读过MSA的进四大,一个移民了,一个在NY一半工资租房子?
开玩笑吧...