Students with CSEE background get more benefit from UC because there are so many quant fund or prop trading firms in Chicago, which give extremely good compensation (require hard core programming/math skills at same time). Also The competition is significantly less in Chicago as well. But if you want to do quant in IB, Columbia is probably a better choice. Not sure about MAFN's placement. Know a guy working in my team as IT is from that program though (still good pay, 100K base + 50K sign-in bonus) Other two programs are not comparable at all. Not sure how other guys get UC=UIUC but that is just bs, not even mention Fordham. Finance may be the industry that discriminate school brand most. -- by 会员 youayou (2011/3/14 12:59:43)
To Morningside,我是对此评论的。。。 前台IT的话,50%bonus还是可能的吧 -- by 会员 CorCorC (2011/3/14 13:48:50)
投行前台 = IBD ST PWM Research PE(fund) 投行里IT永远是BO -- by 会员 MorningSide (2011/3/14 13:50:58)
Do you know Morgan Stanley PDT? Or Credit Suisse AES?Those are definitey pure tech FO team. MS is now building a desk strategist team mixed with traditional quant and developer/IT people. It may be reasonable to think in your way 10 years ago. But for now it is absurd to refer IT only to database, network or other infrastructure team, as more derivatives become standard, electrical, clearing/central trading. -- by 会员 youayou (2011/3/14 22:45:59)
顶LS!严重同意。MS的PDT组听说可全是Phd,属于quant trading,他们的头Peter Muller是墙街的传奇人物。最近IB的prop trading要spin off,报道讲他们组要自己独立出去开fund。 |