Baruch宣传疑点考究。

woshiyigemajia

你说的也只是你自己的解释吧？

also, like I said earlier, part time students do not need to seek employment right after completing the program... because they are already working full time. they will probably wanna switch jobs later as they have enhanced their skill set through the program but it makes sense that they will take some time to do that, as opposed to full time students who usually are desperate to find a job right away

-- by 会员 BunBuddy (2011/2/26 13:44:31)

BunBuddy

ok im not imposing my "idea" on anyone. all im doing here is pointing out the flaws in your statements.  If you consider that as my opinion about the school, then sure, I dont have a problem with that. after all, we are just having a discuss on something we obviously have diff views.  Whoever reads this thread should be able to decide what they think of the school on their own.

hardballlee

ls童鞋对就业数据偏差猜想挺合理的。。。
lz要的就是全面的数据，然后判定好坏。
但相比其他学校，B在数据公开这块已经挺透明的了吧，只是差了part-time入学和毕业后的具体数据，应该就能凑齐，但不能作为B家不给力的间接证据。
还有，判断学校好坏，收集就读和毕业生的评论也很重要，但是难量化，且真实与否无从考究，但应是作为考虑学校很有价值的信息。
具体读哪，除了看排名看就业薪金，还得考虑教学风格整体氛围到底适不适合自己，至于就业，单个学生个体素质与偏好也是不一样的。

makeithappen99

不管怎么说 我觉得baruch的面试 还是比较好的招人机制吧 我觉得baruch很好啊 = =

JASO

楼主迫于压力改题目了 哈哈

大荣

...

zhaopenglu

我觉的无论怎么说，LZ的出发点非常好，为了给大家一个正确的美国校园情况。如果没有像LZ这样的人，大家很有可能被美帝国主义欺骗。当下金融危机还没起色，很多学校的Endowment没有恢复，为了维持学校的正常开支，也想着很多人没了工作会选择来商学院回避，于是乎大举开办各种各样莫名其妙闻所未闻的专业，依次来扩大招生，赚取学费。这里也没有道德与不道德之分。所谓资本主义，金钱当道。我们其实应该多鼓励LZ这样的人，把大家觉得有问题的学校和项目 拿出来进行讨论，免得大家花了冤枉钱。几十万对大家都不是个小数目

zhaopenglu

当然，讨论最好还是有current student来参与，能够提供很多inside information。外人无论怎样，也是雾里看花。

tb18

我一直觉得看就业数据就是要用批判的眼光。因为本来就是一种广告。

CDer2011

LZ脑残，鉴定完毕，就算你被一些top项目录取了，也看不出来你到底有多top

-- by 会员 changeprofile (2011/2/26 13:40:24)