ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3040|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助小安阅读第二篇的一道题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-14 20:07:07 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Woodrow Wilson was referring to the liberal idea of the economic market when he said that the free enterprise system is the most efficient economic system. Maximum freedom means maximum productiveness; our “openness” is to be the measure of our stability. Fascination with this ideal has made Americans defy the “Old World” categories of settled possessiveness versus unsettling deprivation, the cupidity of retention versus the cupidity of seizure, a “status quo” defended or attacked. The United States, it was believed, had no status quo ante. Our only “station” was the turning of a stationary wheel, spinning faster and faster. We did not base our system on property but opportunity—which meant we based it not on stability but on mobility. The more things changed, that is, the more rapidly the wheel turned, the steadier we would be. The conventional picture of class politics is composed of the Haves, who want a stability to keep what they have, and the Have-Nots, who want a touch of (a touch of:
有一点) instability and change in which to scramble for (scramble for: v.争夺, 勉强拼凑) the things they have not. But Americans imagined a condition in which speculators, self-makers, runners are always using the new opportunities given by our land. These economic leaders (front-runners) would thus be mainly agents of change. The nonstarters were considered the ones who wanted stability, a strong referee to give them some position in the race, a regulative hand to calm manic speculation; an authority that can call things to a halt, begin things again from compensatorily staggered “starting lines.”Reform” in America has been sterile because it can imagine no change except through the extension of this metaphor of a race, wider inclusion of competitors, “
a piece of the action,” as it were, for the disenfranchised. There is no attempt to call off the race. Since our only stability is change, America seems not to honor the quiet work that achieves social interdependence and stability. There is, in our legends, no heroism of the office clerk (office clerk: n.职员), no stable industrial work force of the people who actually make the system work. There is no pride in being an employee (Wilson asked for a return to the time when everyone was an employer). There has been no boasting about our social workers—they are merely signs of the system’s failure, of opportunity denied or not taken, of things to be eliminated. We have no pride in our growing interdependence, in the fact that our system can serve others, that we are able to help those in need; empty boasts from the past make us ashamed of our present achievements, make us try to forget or deny them, move away from them. There is no honor but in the Wonderland (wonderland: n.仙境, 奇境)race we must all run, all trying to win, none winning in the end (for there is no end).



In the context of the author’s discussion of regulating change, which of the following could be most probably regarded as a “strong referee” (line 30) in the United States?
(A) A school principal
(B) A political theorist
(C) A federal court judge
(D) A social workerC

(E) A government inspector
我怎么都不明白为什么选C   求高手帮助
In the context of the author’s discussion of regulating change, which of the following could be most probably regarded as a “strong referee” (line 30) in the United States?
(A) A school principal
(B) A political theorist
(C) A federal court judge
(D) A social workerC

(E) A government inspector
我怎么都不明白为什么选C   求高手帮助
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-2-14 20:33:07 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
板凳
发表于 2011-6-27 10:08:14 | 只看该作者
首先要看懂这句话:
The nonstarters were considered the ones who wanted stability, a strong referee to give them some position in the race, a regulative hand to calm manic speculation; an authority that can call things to a halt, begin things again from compensatorily staggered “starting lines.”
a strong referee to give them some position in the race在第一个长句里面担当状语,修饰the ones, 即the nonstarters;
然后注意后面的关键字"a regulative hand" and "an authority",联想到前面的"the conventional picture of class politics",能得出a strong referee指的是来自官方的管制/管理。

In the context of the author’s discussion of regulating change, which of the following could be most probably regarded as a “strong referee” (line 30) in the United States?
(A) A school principal
(B) A political theorist
(C) A federal court judge
(D) A social workerC

(E) A government inspector
我怎么都不明白为什么选C   求高手帮助
-- by 会员 lovegmatever (2011/2/14 20:07:07)

地板
发表于 2011-6-27 10:17:08 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
5#
发表于 2017-2-23 13:34:39 | 只看该作者
wupenghui2000 发表于 2011-6-27 10:08
首先要看懂这句话:The nonstarters were considered the ones who wanted stability, a strong referee to ...

那为什么不能选E?E不是指的政府检查员,C指的联邦法院法官,完全不对啊感觉...感觉E更好的说...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-25 02:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部