ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1824|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LR求解!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-11 18:04:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking
second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept.
They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for
public use.

Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not
unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for
public use.

为什么是B,绕来绕去没搞明白,高手解答
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-2-15 09:49:27 | 只看该作者
If architecture is inviting and functional for public architecture, then it is unobtrusive.

Modern archetects plagued by egoism have violated the above precept. Violate is the key word.

Therefore, when modern archetects are plagued by egoism, they are not unobtrusive.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 18:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部