[求助]大全-I-19,大全-I-20

Pudding

救..... 命.....

beechanooi

For I-19:

What's the purpose for media to find divergent sources? We can infer that different sources might have different view on one issue. If everytime different source will show the same opinion with government, it would be meaningless to find the divergent/alternative/different sources.

Try to understand the tone used in D: "would probably not share the same view", it didn't say "denfinitely will have different view".

If you selected B, you used outside knowledge. The qustion didn't mention that State Department will try to release false information in foreign affairs. Even someone (say source A) has different view on certain affairs with State Department, it doesn't mean either source A or State Department is questionable in it's integrity. Integrity does not eaqul to Truth. If I follow State Department's opinion on one thing, and it turn out that the opinion is biased, do you think my integrity has been jeopardised? Maybe because my trust in State Department, I was fooled by them.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-10 6:53:15编辑过]

岁寒三宝

偶也8明白

wanderdreaｍ

第20题,company’s total number of light bulbs proudced不是2000吗,他现在说做2000,500reject,那不是total number reduce,有符合原文,不是吗

照你说的话，选项B变成下面才对阿

the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were not reduced

这样说才能成为假设

所以B其实说翻了

岁寒三宝

19题再顶

ethyl

Informed people generally assimilate information from several divergent sources before coming to an opinion. However, most popular news organizations view foreign affairs solely through the eyes of our State Department. In reporting the political crisis in foreign country B, news organizations must endeavor to find alternative sources of information.

Which of the following inferences can be drawn from the argument above?

(A) To the degree that a news source gives an account of another country that mirrors that of our State Department, that reporting is suspect.

(B) To protect their integrity, news media should avoid the influence of State Department releases in their coverage of foreign affairs.

(C) Reporting that is not influenced by the State Department is usually more accurate than are other accounts.

(D) The alternative sources of information mentioned in the passage would probably not share the same views as the State Department.

(E) A report cannot be seen as influenced by the State Department if it accurately depicts the events in a foreign country.

关于D，前面的人已经讨论了很多，并且基本上把整确的东西已经提出来了。

文章说最后一句的意思包含：alternative resource 是必要条件。

第一句说信息来源要divergent.

结合这两句话：这个alternative resource很可能就是包含着与State Depar.的不同的信息。

因此，D正确。

转载lawyer一句话：（归纳题的答案）是原文某句话的重写或逆否命题或某几句话的结合，特别是原文有充分必要推理的。

拖泥

关于19题的D答案,还是觉得有问题.

wslinfeng

    

人接受信息一般是从几个有分歧的，不同的信息来源。然而，大多数新闻组织看待外交食物都仅仅通过我们国家部门的视角来看。在报道外国的政治危机时，新闻组织应该尽力去找到其他的信息来源。

    

本文是推论，所以更好用无关词排除：

    

(A提到的是political crisis和foreign affair，an account of another country ，文中未提到，无关。

    

(B) Integrity无关排除

    

(C) more accurate无干。

    

(D) 文中提到的其他信息来源视角将和我们国家部门的视角不同。为什么作者认为应当尽力去寻找替代的信息来源呢，因为人接受信息一般是从几个有分歧的，不同的信息来源，显然，如果其他的替代信息来源和我们国家部门的视角一样的话，显然人们也不会接受信息的。

    (E)  accurately depicts无关


第二题：生产2000个，拒绝500个，为了保持生产的灯泡质量每周都一致，显然经历认为他保留下来的灯泡质量是一致的。

parisping

以下是引用tina_aya在2004-5-16 0:52:00的发言：

不好意思,我还是有不懂的地方

第19题还不是懂,可以详细解释给我听吗

第20题,company’s total number of light bulbs proudced不是2000吗,他现在说做2000,500reject,那不是total number reduce,有符合原文,不是吗

Total NO.是没有减少的。因为它的Total NO。就是2000，只是被接受的只有1500

lijiahui0422

D 不是说probably么，不是说一定不同，只是来源不同很有可能观点不同，轻拍~