ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6095|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 251 再问.

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-11 16:43:00 | 只看该作者

OG 251 再问.

251. The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. .


(A)  extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than


(B)  extinction; its numbers are now five times more than


(C)  extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were


(D)  extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had


(E)   extinction, now with numbers five times greater than



答案是 a .



曾经问过一遍,关于numbers. 查了前人的解释.不理它了.



但是今天再作发现a 有点不对. its numbers are now five times greater than ( its numbers were)when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. .



这里省略的部分与前面不同, 至少要补一个did 才对吧




前面的帖子好像没人讨论这个问题.  请教各位.

沙发
发表于 2004-5-11 21:59:00 | 只看该作者
I think in here "than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's" is more like "than before" or "than anticipated". You can say it should be "than the numbers were when ......", it seems that you can just use the time adverbial (clause) follow "than" to indicate the comparison between different time.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-12 11:40:00 | 只看该作者

great! i get it ~

thanks!

地板
发表于 2004-6-8 14:09:00 | 只看该作者

关于numbers. 查了前人的解释.不理它了


Why I cannot find it by search, could tell me how to find it?  Thanks!



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-19 12:24:16编辑过]
5#
发表于 2004-6-8 14:22:00 | 只看该作者
I got it
6#
发表于 2004-8-7 10:36:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用axbycd在2004-6-8 14:22:00的发言:
I got it


Can you post the link here? I have the same question and didn't find the former posts. Thanks
7#
发表于 2004-8-7 10:42:00 | 只看该作者

2楼解释的很清楚了,when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's是一个时间状语;就像我们通常所说的than before。

8#
发表于 2004-8-7 12:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用axbycd在2004-6-8 14:09:00的发言:

关于numbers. 查了前人的解释.不理它了


Why I cannot find it by search, could tell me how to find it?  Thanks!





Do you know the link? I'm confused by this .
9#
发表于 2004-8-7 14:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用leeon在2004-8-7 10:42:00的发言:

2楼解释的很清楚了,when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's是一个时间状语;就像我们通常所说的than before。



我认为是now和when时间状语从句的比较。把其类比为than before也未尝不可。


number的大小常用great来修饰  而不用more








[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-7 14:51:02编辑过]
10#
发表于 2005-5-19 15:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用麻集爱在2004-5-11 16:43:00的发言:

251. The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. .



(A)  extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than



(B)  extinction; its numbers are now five times more than



(C)  extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were



(D)  extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had



(E)   extinction, now with numbers five times greater than



答案是 a .



曾经问过一遍,关于numbers. 查了前人的解释.不理它了.



但是今天再作发现a 有点不对. its numbers are now five times greater than ( its numbers were)when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. .



这里省略的部分与前面不同, 至少要补一个did 才对吧




前面的帖子好像没人讨论这个问题.  请教各位.


请NN解惑,在比较句的省略中,是不是前面是 sb/sth be,后面也是sb/sth be ,在没有歧异的情况下可以省略,而不用理会两个动词是不是同一时态

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-5 12:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部