在网上搜到一个貌似"1.1.3气味在print advertising应用"的原文，请确认

moonyee5

刚杀G归来的筒子们确认一下吧~~~谢谢谢谢

肥熊

帮顶，此帖勿沉

seyouji

和我找的一样

Does it matter if it smells? Olfactory stimuli as advertising executional cues.

Executional cues have been the focus of much advertising research. Visual cues (pictures) and aural cues (music) have been studied extensively, yet virtually no attention has been paid to the influence of olfactory cues in advertising despite the growing trend among advertisers to use scents in ads. Scents often have been used in advertisements for products in which scent is a primary attribute (e.g., perfumes, room fresheners) and, when used in that context, are a form of sampling. However, scents have also been used for products for which scent has been considered largely irrelevant. For instance, Tanqueray gin ran a pine-scented ad in USA Today, Rolls Royce advertised its cars in Architectural Digest using leather-scented strips, and the State of Utah used floral- and spice-scented panels in a four-page tourism ad. Though such uses may be intended simply as novelties, research suggests that odors can influence mood state (Baron 1990; Ehrlichman and Bastone 1992; Knasko 1992) and affect judgment (Baron 1990; Bone and Jantrania 1992; Spangenberg, Crowley and Henderson 1996). Therefore, the use of scents in advertising warrants attention.

Odors differ in several ways from the pictures and sounds more familiar to advertising researchers. Compared to visual and aural cues, odors are difficult to recognize, are relatively difficult to label, may produce false alarms and create placebo effects. Schab (1991), in a review of the literature, concluded that the ability to attach a name to a particular odor is so limited that individuals, on average, can identify only 40% to 50% of odors in a battery of common odors. Additionally, consumer ability to detect and recognize odors is influenced by surrounding cues (Davis 1981). For example, a consumer is more likely to recognize a lemon scent when the scent is contained in a yellow liquid than when it is contained in a red liquid. Third, false alarms, perceiving an odor when in reality no odor is present, are relatively common (Engen 1972). Finally, researchers have shown that both emotional and physical states can be affected just by believing an odor is present. The odorant itself need not be present (Knasko, Gilbert, and Sabini 1990). That finding suggests placebo effects.

Despite the difficulties, olfactory cues hold appeal to advertisers working in an already cluttered environment. Olfactory responses are primarily autonomic, affecting a person physiologically before affecting cognition. Odors stimulate the limbic system, the part of the brain responsible for emotional responses. Thus, olfaction represents a different path to the consumer than is afforded by other types of cues.

We examined a consumer-controlled odor delivery system (scratch-and-sniff panels) as opposed to ambient systems to (1) explore the usefulness of olfactory stimuli as an executional cue in influencing attitude toward the ad (Aad) and attitude toward the brand (Ab), (2) determine whether those effects are moderated by motivation to process and cue fit, and (3) examine the mediators of processes that may underlie olfactory cue effects (i.e., mood, hedonic transfer of scent pleasantness, and cognitions).

H1: Using scent in an advertisement can influence attitudes (a) by altering mood state, (b) through hedonic transfer of the perceived scent pleasantness, or (c) by stimulating cognitive elaboration

mjmjwzhwzh

v5

肥熊

ding

iamyiyi

顶

cherry12345

你可不可以把答案也放上来看看

石仙

fighting together!

hellokitty32

自己顶一下
没有筒子确认？
没关系
大家参考着看好啦

vcheung

顶上去~考完的NN帮忙确认一下~