og12 cr 56

719870465

The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising
of legal services, the more lawyers there are who
advertise their services, and the lawyers who
advertise a specific service usually charge less for
that service than the lawyers who do not advertise.
Therefore, if the state removes any of its current
restrictions, such as the one against advertisements
that do not specify fee arrangements, overall
consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state
retains its current restrictions.
If the statements above are true, which of the
following must be true?
(A) Some lawyers who now advertise will charge
more for specific services if they do not have to
specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.
(B) More consumers will use legal services if there
are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal
services.
(C) If the restriction against advertisements that do
not specify fee arrangements is removed, more
lawyers will advertise their services.
(D) If more lawyers advertise lower prices for
specific services, some lawyers who do not
advertise will also charge less than they
currently charge for those services.
(E) If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal
services were those that apply to every type of
advertising, most lawyers would advertise their
services.
答案选C，是在是看不明白，请大牛翻译一下题目和C选项好么？
特别是such as the one against advertisements
that do not specify fee arrangements这句话

719870465

还有就是，这道题是怎么推出来的

浆果

题目本身的意思是：legal service advertisement 的广告限制越少，lawyer 越会给他们的服务做广告，而且对于他们广告中的这个服务收费比不做广告的lawyer也就越低。因此，如果一个州remove显存的限制广告的条例，例如 反对广告中不写出service费用范畴的广告的条例， 消费者就会比不消除限制时候的legal cost要低。
题目问如果上边正确，则下边那个选项必然正确
此种题是选最直接的结果。
题中说消除限制，lawyer做广告的就多了，收费也就低了。
如果选必然正确的，那么我们得出此题C选项正好就是这个最直接的结果。