- UID
- 551204
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-30
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
2013-2014 COLUMBIA ESSAY ANALYSIS-I
Short Answer Question: What is your immediate post-MBA professional goal? (100 characters maximum)
Significant change from last year, in the CHARACTERS allowance: 200 to 100. This is CBS’s way of saying “take a hint, please… and get to the point.” 100 characters isn’t dinner, a stroll around the park, a lovely nightcap against a backdrop of smooth jazz, into “who knows.” It’s more… the 1-hour motel model. Lay it on em.
Perhaps the most liberating way to approach this is to see this NOT as an opportunity to impress, but rather to inform. All they want is a RUDDER. To help frame the rest of your essays. That’s all. It’s the equivalent of “state your name and occupation” – a measure taken just so everyone has their bearings.
Ergo, don’t overthink it. The prize here is clarity, not intrigue. Don’t feel the pressure to wow. And don’t waste precious air-time writing stuff like “My immediate post-MBA professional goal is to…” because that would have been half your response. 1-hour motel, folks. Getterdone. Resume-like brevity, but… good-resume-like CLARITY.
One last thing—there’s a difference between “post/position” and “goal.” The best answer here nails both. Too often, we see candidates simply list the name of a position at a company, which is mostly meaningless. We need a touch of context to understand what the “aim” is, “why position X” within your 100-character response. So, roughly speaking, it may take on this structure: “position x in order to y.” Or, “achieve x at y (type) company.”
Essay 1: Given your individual background, why are you pursuing a Columbia MBA at this time? (Maximum 500 words)
Again, in the direction of more Spartan if you’re comparing this year’s to last year’s. Is this tweak significant? Isn’t is ultimately the same thing, just shuffled around a bit? Sorta. But not really.
Columbia is framing an argument here for you. A very simple one actually. They want you to make a crystal clear connection between your thirst for an MBA and your (career) trajectory thus far. The key idea here is that these aren’t two unconnected concepts—that you want/need an MBA, and that you have a career or background in X. According to CBS (and by the way, all other top MBA programs), these two things must be joined at the hip. Think of this as a DARE. Imagine sitting across from a CBS admissions dean, while he reviews your resume and your stated reasons for pursuing an MBA at Columbia. Now, imagine that he places the resume on the table, folds his arms, looks down the bridge of his nose at you and says, “I don’t believe that your background has anything to do with your desire to get an MBA. Prove it.”
That’s what this is. A mathematical proof. Your job is to CONVINCE A SKEPTIC that your trajectory thus far has you on a collision course with an MBA. Show us what it is you’ve done, what it is you “do,” and give us a taste for what it is you WANT to do, and therefore… why a COLUMBIA MBA is a necessary means to that end. It must be the case that Columbia is a necessary ingredient here—convince us why. Convince us that your vision must include certain things only (or BEST) attainable at CBS, in order for you to CONTINUE along the trajectory that’s already in motion. Forget everything else you’ve done with another school’s prompt, right now you only have eyes for Columbia.
Here’s another way to think about it:
Here’s what I’m really good at: XXX
Here’s the proof: Experience X, I did Y; Experience A, I did B
Here’s what I WANT to be doing: YYY
(and why this turns me on)
Here’s why I can’t just achieve all that today—I’m missing some stuff: ABC
Here’s why CBS helps deliver the BEST version of ABC to my arsenal
At the very least, the foundation of your essay contains all of these pieces. Now, how you PRESENT that is up to you. There isn’t one knock-out shape an essay must take in order to be convincing. But, underneath it, these elements must be bullet-proof and worked out in your head.
The sculpting part is easy, the flair, the polish, all that stuff is a breeze—the hardest part is developing an immutable argument that NO one can poke a hole in.
Essay 2: Columbia Business School is located in the heart of the world’s business capital – Manhattan. How do you anticipate that New York City will impact your experience at Columbia? (Maximum 250 words) (See videos on CBS website for inspiration)
Actionable, practical, real-life, believable, tangible arguments, folks. Not… “stuff everyone knows about New York already but doesn’t demonstrate a connection to you personally.” Don’t tell us that New York is the financial capital of the world. Show us—instead—how that might affect your experience. Walk us through a hypothetical. Or a way in which NYC has affected you already and how, therefore, it may affect you again once you’re at CBS. Don’t just tell us what the opportunities are—don’t LIST stuff. We know the list. Columbia knows the list. No one cares about the attributes.
In 250 words, there isn’t much room to faff. Walk us through one or two very tangible examples of what may happen, and why this is valuable. Challenge yourself and imagine that each of the world’s most amazing cities had comparable business schools. And let’s say you were accepted to each of them. Why New York over the rest?
Here’s another way to skin it. Congratulations, you’ve been accepted to Stanford, Wharton, and Harvard. But you’re gonna turn all three down because they all lack one thing: New York City. Convince us that you’re the kind of guy who might actually turn down H/S/W for this reason—it has to be specific as hell in order to pass the smell test.
Think back to chemistry. Think back to acids and bases. Think litmus paper. Ringing a bell? We know, it was a long time ago for us, too. Well, roughly speaking here’s how it works—if you have a MYSTERY substance, say a liquid, and we’re trying to determine whether it’s basic or acidic, we dip a piece of litmus paper into the liquid to … see how it reacts. If it turns BLUE it means the solution is basic; if it turns RED it means the solution is acidic. Same paper, different colors based on the X-factor of the mystery solutions.
To CBS, you guys are the mysterious clear solution. They have no idea what happens when you “mix with” New York City. This is a model you can consider. Something HAPPENS when you (clear liquid solution) MIXES WITH New York City (the Litmus paper).
What can we learn about you based on this chemical equation New York City + You = XXXX?
The absolute worst thing you can do is tell us about New York. Similarly, we don’t wanna know about YOU either (in isolation). We wanna know about the COLLISION of you and NYC. Our safety goggles are on. Let the mixing commence.
To be continued.
@JonFrank
HBS 2005 |
|