ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2092|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-15-2-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-27 19:34:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-15-2-11

11. Unless they are used as strictly temporary measures, rent-control ordinances ( municipal regulations placing limits on rent increases) have several negative effects for renters. One of these is that the controls will bring about a shortage of rental units. This disadvantage for renters occurs over the long run, but the advantage –smaller rent increases—occurs immediately. In many municipalities, specifically in all those where tenants of rent-control units have a secure hold on political power and can get rent-control ordinances enacted or repealed, it is invariably the desire for short –term gain that guides those tenants in the exercise of that power.


If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred form them? (A) It is impossible for landlords to raise rents when rent controls are in effect.


(B) In many municipalities rent-control ordinances are repealed as soon as shortages of rental unites arise.


(C) The only negative effect of tent control for renters is that it brings about a shortage of rental units.


(D) In many municipalities there is now, or eventually will be, a shortage of rental units.


(E) In the long term, a shortage of rental units will raise rents substantially.


D 答案没问题,想问问E是不是因为substantially一词错而排除的,还是有其他原因


沙发
发表于 2004-4-27 20:19:00 | 只看该作者

既然问的是which one of the following can be properly inferred form them?,那么就该遵循一个原则,即只知道题目中提到的内容,不知道题目之外的任何内容,尤其不能根据常识对题目中的内容进行推理和延伸

本题中仅提到了长期来看,由于RENT CONTROL会使出租房短缺,没有说短缺会导致房价上涨(不能自己根据供求原理进行推理)所以E错

关于归纳题有一些解题原则,大牛们有很好的总结,MM先找来看看吧

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-3-2 00:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部