ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1364|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

feifei-100

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-26 22:20:00 | 只看该作者

请教狒狒逻辑no.100

Questions 100


Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.


Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist, Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.


100. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?


(A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze is inaccurate.


(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved.


(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.


(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.


(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.


正确的解为(B)     想请教(E)选项为何不佳 ?


我思考的点 : (B)为整个题干的浓缩  (E)则为最后一句话的改写

两者似乎都不佳 ?1
沙发
发表于 2004-4-26 22:38:00 | 只看该作者

E是直接事实,不用infer了;infer题不像阅读中的直接事实题,找一个跟原文一模一样的就OK;infer题需要在原文的基础上作一些变换。

B用了三重否定;把Anson 的几句话连接成一句话。 这就是infer.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-26 22:50:00 | 只看该作者

呼呼 ~~ 谢谢版主

解释的好清楚 ^ ^  3Q 3Q

深刻感受到拨云见月的快乐 呵呵
地板
发表于 2004-4-26 23:04:00 | 只看该作者
惭愧,我的逻辑不太好。weiyu大哥才牛。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-26 23:09:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用JerryGuan在2004-4-26 23:04:00的发言:
惭愧,我的逻辑不太好。weiyu大哥才牛。


哇 !!!!!!!!     逻..辑...不.... 太好 !!!????

謝謝你用力重創我脆弱的心靈 !!!!

嗚嗚嗚 .....

6#
发表于 2004-4-27 03:02:00 | 只看该作者
原题中最后一句是充分条件, E 将其反推结果不一定成立. 不妥之处, 请NN指教...
7#
发表于 2005-9-13 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用叮当在2004-4-27 3:02:00的发言:
原题中最后一句是充分条件, E 将其反推结果不一定成立. 不妥之处, 请NN指教...


同意
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 22:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部