ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3457|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT 2001/10 23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-5-23 09:48:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT 2001/10 23

2001/10  23
Some statisticians claim that the surest way to increase the overall correctness of the total set of one's belief is: never change that set, except by rejecting a belief when given adequate evidence againest it. However, if this were the only rule one followed, then whenever one were presented with any kind of evidence, one would have to either reject some of one's beliefs or else leave one's beliefs unchanged. But then, over time, one could only have fewer and fewer beliefs. Since we need many beliefs in order to survive, the statisticians' claim must be mistaken.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
(A) presumes, without providing any justification, that the surest way of increasing the overall correctness of the total set of one's beliefs must not hinder one's ability to survice.

(B) neglects the possiblitu that even while following the statisticians' rule, one might also accept new beliefs when presented with some kinds of evidence.

(C) overlooks the possibility that some large sets of beliefs are more correct overall than are some small sets of beliefs.

(D) takes for granted that one should accept some beliefs related to survival even when given adequate evidence againest them

(E) takes for granted that the beliefs we need in order to have many beliefs must all be correct beliefs.


The answer is
A.

请大虾出手解释一下。
沙发
发表于 2003-5-23 10:29:00 | 只看该作者
After reading the passage and all the choices, C,D,E can all be eliminated as they either have nothing to do with the passage or logic, or they contain argument that is beyond the passage.

Then it leaves us with A and B. The reason I choose A is that A is 100% correct, while B states something that is not stated in the passage.

In the passage, the logic is that the surest way will lead to fewer and few beliefs-->hard to survive -->mistaken. As you can see from the first sentence, the purpose of the surest way is to increase correctness of beliefs, and ability to survive is not mentioned. So there is a gap and the author apparently made an assumption that survival is equally important in determining whether the surest way is right or not. Answer A casts doubt on the assumption.

The problem of choice B is that obtaining new beliefs is not discussed in the passage and we have no way to prove that the person can obtain new beliefs if he or she follows the rule.

BTW, I wonder whether it is all right for me to answer questions in English or not. Please let me know.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-5-23 12:11:00 | 只看该作者
多谢mindfree!
你用英文写,就是看的时候要用点心,就像在练习阅读!但是
我已经明了你的意思了。看了你很多解答的帖子,受益非浅。你的逻辑思路相当清晰。使我现在的思路也逐渐清晰起来,不像以前那样多靠直觉。在这里说声多谢!
地板
发表于 2003-5-23 12:22:00 | 只看该作者
英文打起来要快很多.呵呵,所以偷懒了...
5#
发表于 2004-4-11 17:43:00 | 只看该作者

没明白,资质差点。

还是觉得B好。对A的逻辑觉得绕了太多圈,都犯糊涂了。

B直接提供它因,有其它可能导致  总的belief  没减少,那么后续的反驳自然错误了。

6#
发表于 2004-8-23 23:16:00 | 只看该作者

我的看法是:A说文章错误的假设了提高belief正确率必须不阻碍人的生存。 因为,人的生存即可以是提高belief的正确率,同时也可以增加正确的belief,所以这个假设是错误的。A说对了


B本来是对的,但错在它提出是following the statisticians' rule,而这个rule只说到改变belief的唯一方式是在证据充分的条件下排除一个,并没有说增加的情况,所以根据rule是无法推出后半句的。


或许太涩了,意会一下吧,A确实比B好


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-23 23:19:51编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-25 18:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部