在职备战——大道至简

爱兔兰

翻页

张学友

感谢livia,谢谢你,使我对这个考试豁然开朗

livia2012

感谢livia,谢谢你,使我对这个考试豁然开朗

-- by 会员 张学友 (2010/10/2 16:01:18)

歌神太客气了，主要还是您本身悟性好。看来暴力阅读还是有效果滴~

张学友

感谢livia,谢谢你,使我对这个考试豁然开朗

-- by 会员 张学友 (2010/10/2 16:01:18)

歌神太客气了，主要还是您本身悟性好。看来暴力阅读还是有效果滴~

-- by 会员 livia2012 (2010/10/2 16:53:35)

b不是有效果，是非常有效果，我现在每天做阅读就激动，每天早上起来就想做阅读，但我还是克制住我的冲动，先做语法和逻辑！木哈哈！

爱兔兰

很想知道一个知识点 但不知道怎么寻找，就是 现在分词放句尾表结果的时候，到底是修饰啥的呀？是其前面的名词？还是主句主语，亦或是前面整句话的意思？  现在分词放句尾除了表结果还有其他的作用吗？   真的快纠结死我了...  哪位NN能回答我一下啊？！？！

-- by 会员 爱兔兰 (2010/9/30 20:20:33)

修饰整个主句。通常都是表结果，决非没有重大联系的伴随动作或者并存现象等等。见OG26。

-- by 会员 孤独的长跑者 (2010/9/30 20:39:25)

那帮我看看这道题吧

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.

A. imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
B. imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
C. that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
D. that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
E. that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
答案是D

如果让我第一眼见到的话，我选的就是E 觉得逻辑上没有一定要require的主语是plans的意思吧，难道不可以说requiring...and spending...是用来解释stricter limits的吗？我好像记得prep里面有一题就是这样用的...        还有，如果是像D的话，spending到底是修饰啥的喃？我觉得应该是修饰doctors的吧，可放句尾这样有点像修饰limits的了... 很不解啊很不解... 请指教！！！

-- by 会员 爱兔兰 (2010/9/30 20:57:07)

我认为impose 和require是平行的，spending 是前句导致的结果，并不是和前面一系列动作平行的，好像gwd还是prep上有一个类似的题。

-- by 会员 donganyuan (2010/9/30 21:02:36)

我也记得好像是prep上的题，当时我也错来着。有种说法是真平行和假平行，impose和require平行，而spending是伴随状语？
可是怎么判断是伴随状语还是平行呢？有时候给现在分词弄晕了~

-- by 会员 cindybreakaway (2010/10/1 0:31:58)

我也有点晕 所以根据多方显示，貌似只能通过逻辑来看... 就是理解句意吧>_< 哎呀~ 这个SC逻辑还是第一啊，好多题都是逻辑不清晰给弄错滴>_<

-- by 会员 爱兔兰 (2010/10/1 8:56:28)

找到了...前几天说的那个动名词放句尾的用法...  这个题中的动名词 总不能说是修饰前面整个句子吧？！？！

The hognose snake puts on an impressive bluff, hissing and rearing back, broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but, having no dangerous fangs and no venom, eventually, if its pursuer is not cowed by the performance, will fall over and play dead.
(A) broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but, having no dangerous fangs and no venom,
(B) broadens the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigns repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom,
(C) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigning repeated strikes, but it has no dangerous fangs and no venom, and
(D) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does and feigns repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom, and
(E) broadening the flesh behind its head the way a cobra does, feigning repeated strikes, but with no dangerous fangs and no venom, and
我觉得后面并列的那一串动名词是修饰an impressive bluff的呀...

孤独的长跑者

不对。bluff不是逻辑主语。所以是修饰前面的整个句子。

爱兔兰

不对。bluff不是逻辑主语。所以是修饰前面的整个句子。

-- by 会员 孤独的长跑者 (2010/10/2 23:23:12)

啊？难道那些动作不是为了 put an impressive bluff？？？

张学友

昨晚看得太晚了吧，注意休息

livia2012

DAY 46

睁眼就用BF电脑摸了一套prep，数学摸个了46分，总算不是38了，继续努力后就忘了上网了......

1. 模拟prep+review  done

2.GWD Verbal 回顾 done

3.数学狗+再摸prep数学 （我就不信上不了50了）

4.改错强化

5.作文强化

呜啦呜啦dd

我数学也是48 49 49 然后50的~