ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 769|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道飞飞逻辑。。。快考了

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-21 14:46:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
121. Observatory director: Some say that funding the mega telescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have satisfied their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.

If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the mega telescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?

A.    It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.
B.    It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.
C.    It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.
D.    It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual senses of “benefit”.
E.    It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.
答案是E。求解释!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-24 19:45:45 | 只看该作者
顶!!!
板凳
发表于 2010-7-24 20:03:30 | 只看该作者
E的意思是mega telescope research 和显赫科学家的研究没有可比性,没可比性就没说服力啦
ABCD都是无关选项
地板
发表于 2010-7-24 20:14:53 | 只看该作者
A.加强了原文
B.无关干扰选项
C.同上
D.同上.
E.作者没有把mega telescope和beneficial applications联系起来.此选项正好抓住这点来攻击原文论据.

希望对你有所帮助!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-2 20:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部