7。2北京一战 实在不理想，奉献一点寂静

wemustrun

ls:貌似第三篇是狗狗里的。。第一篇。好像也是。
现在刚换题库没多久。。狗狗必然不会全的。
大概有50多篇

-- by 会员 nowwsy (2010/7/2 15:39:15)

每个月阅读的题库就50多篇吗？

reyes0413

谢谢楼主狗狗
来考个古，辛苦楼主了，看看第一篇是不是这个
"阅读有一篇是十九世纪妇女政治参与的；
第一段：说了从50年代到70年代不同的scholars对妇女在politics party里面的地位，以前都是没有人关注她们的存在的，后来的学者关注妇女的作用，并提到后来有不少妇女自己建立party。
第二段：说了妇女在politics中的地位，说女性在政党或是选举的人数比以往多，看似女性的政治地位提升，提高了地位什么的，参与政治也更深入，但实际情况并非如此。参加选举的女的多并不意味着当选的女的就多。并且她们在政府关键职位的比重并没有上升。于是，开始解释政治体制的原因。说政党只是在一些特定的情况下才让女 性党员去参与竞选，比如肯定能获胜或者数个候选人竞选数个OPENING的情况，因为发现那些让女的参加选举的往往是因为那场选举胜率不大的选举。所以为何女性竞选成功的少，有部分原因是因为，多数情况下incumbent（此处的incumbent指的是在职者，就是指原本的当选者有可能后面继续连任）获胜的机率大，而原先的在职者就是男性居多，所以女性成功的少。还有就是女性多数只是竞选较低层次的位置，而那些高层次的基本都没有女性 （仅供参考，不是很清楚，说是并不是在所有层面上），最后说什么造成这样的状况。
问题1、主旨题。我选的选项大意是give  expanation to  why a possible phenomenon not occur(就是一开始research提出的possible  phenomenon)  
问题2、问research probably will agree with which one
问题3、female candidate 的那题  其中有一题问题忘了，但我选的答案是，如果没有incumbent（一定要搞懂这词啥意思），那么男女竞选的机率是一样的（大概是这么个意思）
"

-- by 会员 ozymendias (2010/7/2 16:27:35)

不是的，年代是19世纪末到20世纪初，讲女性的political style的变化，不是在party中的地位，主要还是关注女性自身的变化，没有比较男女。

nowwsy

求lz确认·~那个很GWD
GWD-11-Q35 -Q37当代女权主义者对20年代妇女选举权运动的评价
     Recent feminist scholarship con-         早期人们以妇女选举权运动众所周知地
    cerning the United States in the 1920’s     “得到保证”来评价美国的1920’s，
    challenges earlier interpretations that     最近，女权主义者挑战这一观点。
Line    assessed the twenties in terms of the
 (5)    unkept “promises” of the women’s
suffrage movement.  This new scholar-         新观点驳斥道，因为妇女在1920年获
ship disputes the long-held view that            投票权后，妇女投票组织没有实体化，
because a women’s voting bloc did not          选举权不能为妇女争得长久的政治利益。
materialize after women gained the right
(10)    to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to
produce long-term political gains for
women.  These feminist scholars also          女权学家也认为选举权失败，因为它没
challenge the old view that pronounced         有遵守妇女投票将带来道德的无腐败的
suffrage a failure for not delivering on           统治的诺言。
(15)    the promise that the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance.  Asked whether              被问到选举权是否失败时，他们引用世
women’s suffrage was a failure, these           纪交替时的社会改革家JA的话：“为
scholars cite the words of turn-of-the-            何你不问选举权是否全面失败？“
(20)    century social reformer Jane Addams,
    “Why don’t you ask if suffrage in
    general is failing?”学者的观点认为suffrage是失败
     In some ways, however, these递进       在某些方面，这些女权学者仍然认为
scholars still present the 1920’s as a              1920’s是衰落时期。
(25)    period of decline. After suffrage, they     他们说选举权后，女权运动失去了凝
argue, the feminist movement lost its              聚力，性别意识下降。
cohesiveness, and gender conscious-
ness waned.  After the mid-1920’s, few          1920’s中期后，鲜见女权改革家的成
successes could be claimed by fem-              就：在成功立法方面很少见。
(30)    inist reformers: little could be seen in
the way of legislative victories. 衰退的年代 new scholarship的另一观点
     During this decade, however, there        然而在此时期，以取得更多妇女自治
    was intense activism aimed at achiev-      为目标的强烈的激进主义存在着，扩
ing increased autonomy for women,             宽到妇女的日常生活领域。
(35)     broadening the spheres within which
they lived their daily lives.  Women’s            妇女组织的工作为妇女提供机会：
organizations worked to establish
opportunities for women: they strove to          他们致力于保障妇女完全的公民权利，
    secure for women the full entitlements        包括管理办公室及服务陪审庭的权利。
(40)    of citizenship, including the right to hold
office and the right to serve on juries.最终观点 不同意recent的观点
老新观点
逻辑简图：
1P: recent scholarship challenges earlier interpretations unkept “promise” of women suffrage. Disputes, also challenges older view…
2P: in some ways, however, decline….
3P: during this decade, however, intense activism…. Women’ organization worked to establish opportunities for women…
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-11-Q35:
The passage is primarily concerned with
        
providing evidence indicating that feminist reformers of the 1920’s failed to reach some of their goals偏
presenting scholarship that contrasts suffragist “promises” with the historical realities of the 1920’s
discussing recent scholarship concerning the achievements of women’s suffrage during the 1920’s and presenting an alternative view of those achievements
Recent feminist scholarship concerning the United States in the 1920’s challenges earlier interpretations that assessed the twenties in terms of the unkept “promises” of the women’s suffrage movement.  
outlining recent findings concerning events leading to suffrage for women in the 1920’s and presenting a challenge to those findings
providing support for a traditional view of the success of feminist attempts to increase gender consciousness among women during the 1920’s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-11-Q36:
It can be inferred that the author of the passage disagrees with the “new scholarship” mentioned in lines 6-7 regarding the
        
degree to which the “promises” of the suffrage movement remained unkept
degree to which suffrage for women improved the morality of governance
degree to which the 1920’s represented a period of decline for the feminist movement
During this decade, however, there was intense activism aimed at achieving increased autonomy for women,。。。
degree of legislative success achieved by feminist reformers during the 1920’s
accuracy of the view that a women’s voting bloc did not materialize once suffrage was achieved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-11-Q37:※
The purpose of the second paragraph (lines 23-31) of the passage is to

suggest a reason why suffragist “promises” were not kept
contrast suffragist “promises” with the reality of the 1920’s
deplore the lack of successful feminist reform in 1920’s
explain a view held by feminist scholars
answer the question asked by Jane Addams

ozymendias

顶~

reyes0413

求lz确认·~那个很GWD
GWD-11-Q35 -Q37当代女权主义者对20年代妇女选举权运动的评价
     Recent feminist scholarship con-         早期人们以妇女选举权运动众所周知地
   cerning the United States in the 1920’s     “得到保证”来评价美国的1920’s，
   challenges earlier interpretations that     最近，女权主义者挑战这一观点。
Line    assessed the twenties in terms of the
 (5)    unkept “promises” of the women’s
suffrage movement.  This new scholar-         新观点驳斥道，因为妇女在1920年获
ship disputes the long-held view that            投票权后，妇女投票组织没有实体化，
because a women’s voting bloc did not          选举权不能为妇女争得长久的政治利益。
materialize after women gained the right
(10)    to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to
produce long-term political gains for
women.  These feminist scholars also          女权学家也认为选举权失败，因为它没
challenge the old view that pronounced         有遵守妇女投票将带来道德的无腐败的
suffrage a failure for not delivering on           统治的诺言。
(15)    the promise that the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance.  Asked whether              被问到选举权是否失败时，他们引用世
women’s suffrage was a failure, these           纪交替时的社会改革家JA的话：“为
scholars cite the words of turn-of-the-            何你不问选举权是否全面失败？“
(20)    century social reformer Jane Addams,
   “Why don’t you ask if suffrage in
   general is failing?”学者的观点认为suffrage是失败
     In some ways, however, these递进       在某些方面，这些女权学者仍然认为
scholars still present the 1920’s as a              1920’s是衰落时期。
(25)    period of decline. After suffrage, they     他们说选举权后，女权运动失去了凝
argue, the feminist movement lost its              聚力，性别意识下降。
cohesiveness, and gender conscious-
ness waned.  After the mid-1920’s, few          1920’s中期后，鲜见女权改革家的成
successes could be claimed by fem-              就：在成功立法方面很少见。
(30)    inist reformers: little could be seen in
the way of legislative victories. 衰退的年代 new scholarship的另一观点
     During this decade, however, there        然而在此时期，以取得更多妇女自治
   was intense activism aimed at achiev-      为目标的强烈的激进主义存在着，扩
ing increased autonomy for women,             宽到妇女的日常生活领域。
(35)     broadening the spheres within which
they lived their daily lives.  Women’s            妇女组织的工作为妇女提供机会：
organizations worked to establish
opportunities for women: they strove to          他们致力于保障妇女完全的公民权利，
   secure for women the full entitlements        包括管理办公室及服务陪审庭的权利。
(40)    of citizenship, including the right to hold
office and the right to serve on juries.最终观点 不同意recent的观点
老新观点
逻辑简图：
1P: recent scholarship challenges earlier interpretations unkept “promise” of women suffrage. Disputes, also challenges older view…
2P: in some ways, however, decline….
3P: during this decade, however, intense activism…. Women’ organization worked to establish opportunities for women…
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-11-Q35:
The passage is primarily concerned with

providing evidence indicating that feminist reformers of the 1920’s failed to reach some of their goals偏
presenting scholarship that contrasts suffragist “promises” with the historical realities of the 1920’s
discussing recent scholarship concerning the achievements of women’s suffrage during the 1920’s and presenting an alternative view of those achievements
Recent feminist scholarship concerning the United States in the 1920’s challenges earlier interpretations that assessed the twenties in terms of the unkept “promises” of the women’s suffrage movement.  
outlining recent findings concerning events leading to suffrage for women in the 1920’s and presenting a challenge to those findings
providing support for a traditional view of the success of feminist attempts to increase gender consciousness among women during the 1920’s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-11-Q36:
It can be inferred that the author of the passage disagrees with the “new scholarship” mentioned in lines 6-7 regarding the

degree to which the “promises” of the suffrage movement remained unkept
degree to which suffrage for women improved the morality of governance
degree to which the 1920’s represented a period of decline for the feminist movement
During this decade, however, there was intense activism aimed at achieving increased autonomy for women,。。。
degree of legislative success achieved by feminist reformers during the 1920’s
accuracy of the view that a women’s voting bloc did not materialize once suffrage was achieved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GWD-11-Q37:※
The purpose of the second paragraph (lines 23-31) of the passage is to

suggest a reason why suffragist “promises” were not kept
contrast suffragist “promises” with the reality of the 1920’s
deplore the lack of successful feminist reform in 1920’s
explain a view held by feminist scholars
answer the question asked by Jane Addams

-- by 会员 nowwsy (2010/7/2 18:42:38)

不是的

asap

第三篇的RC好像是上月JJ里的。。