ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: rayyzxy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 【笨鸟也能飞,给心态不稳的童鞋】一战 710【.补裤裤啦!.】

[精华] [复制链接]
41#
发表于 2010-6-29 17:12:58 | 只看该作者
14. PQ的距离 是2根号13么? 有没有算过的童鞋确认一下呀~~
42#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-6-29 17:44:53 | 只看该作者
LZ能不能帮我确认一下,阅读关于鸟类进化是否这个?谢谢


Although many lines of evidence indicate that birds evolved from ground-dwelling theropod dinosaurs, some scientists remain unconvinced. They argue that theropods appeared too late to have given rise to birds, noting that Archaeopteryxlithographica – the oldest known bird – appears in the fossil record about 150 million years ago, whereas the fossil remains of various nonavian maniraptor theropods – the closest known relatives of birds – date only to about 115 million years ago. But investigators have now uncovered bones that evidently belong to nonavian maniraptors dating to the time of Archaeopteryx. In any case, failure to find fossils of a predicted kind does not rule out their existence in an undiscovered deposit. Skeptics also argue that the fused clavicles (the “wishbone”) of birds differ from the unfused clavicles of theropods. This objection was reasonable when only early theropod clavicles had been discovered, but fossilized theropod clavicles that look just like the wishbone of Archaeopteryx have now been unearthed. Finally, some scientists argue that the complex lungs of birds could not have evolved from theropod lungs, an assertion that cannot be supported or falsifiedat the moment, because no fossil lungs are preserved in the paleontological record.





T-4-Q5
The primary purpose of the passage is to

A.compare the development of two hypotheses concerning the evolutionary origin of birds

B.suggest revisions to the standard theory of the evolutionary history of birds

C.evaluate the usefulness of fossil evidence in determining the evolutionary history of birds

D.challenge the theory that birds evolved from ground-dwelling theropod dinosaurs

E.respond to criticisms of the theory that birds evolved from ground-dwelling theropod dinosaurs

T-4-Q6
In the context of the passage, the phrase “fossils of a predicted kind”(line 16) most likely refers to which of the following?

A.Theropod fossils with fused clavicles

B.Theropod fossils that are similar in structure to Archaeopteryx fossils

C.Theropod fossils dating back more than 150 million years

D.Fossils indicating the structure of theropod lungs

E.Fossils indicating the structure of Archaeopteryx lungs

T-4-Q7
Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as an argument made by scientists who are unconvinced that birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs?

A.There are no known theropod dinosaur fossils dating from a period after the time of Archaeopteryx.

B.There are no known theropod dinosaur fossils that indicate the structure of those dinosaurs’ lungs.

C.Theropod dinosaurs appear in the fossil record about 150 million years ago.

D.Theropod dinosaurs did not have fused clavicles.

E.Theropod dinosaurs had certain bones that look just like those of Archaeopteryx.
-- by 会员 afei0128 (2010/6/29 15:18:26)



嗯嗯 原题!~ 选什么的丫?~
43#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-6-29 17:45:33 | 只看该作者
恭喜楼主。。。这分数很彪悍啦!!

楼主能否把数学的答案也放上来,以帮助我们参照和讨论呀? 谢谢!!
-- by 会员 ray_shenchen (2010/6/29 15:41:10)

啊... 我就是怕自己做错... 才不敢写上去的..
44#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-6-29 17:46:26 | 只看该作者
LZ, 上次是我回复的你 嘿嘿~~ 考的很好了,尤其是V,你是英语专业还是有货啊!G需要实力+好的心态!但不是每个有好心态的人都能一战700+的,笨鸟就是笨鸟,我14号考,能上600就反应我的真实实力了,呵呵
-- by 会员 wemustrun (2010/6/29 16:21:25)

不怕的 放轻松去考 14号还有狗狗可以看一下呢!~
45#
发表于 2010-6-29 17:52:05 | 只看该作者
14. PQ的距离 是2根号13么? 有没有算过的童鞋确认一下呀~~
-- by 会员 yizhutou1 (2010/6/29 17:12:58)



不是3倍根号5么?
46#
发表于 2010-6-29 19:17:21 | 只看该作者
lz记忆力牛得不行! 我周五杀机,准备得不好,发愤看狗中。
扔砖:大概作了一下数学,大家讨论一下答案吧
1. (2) alone ok
2. (1) (2) together ok
3. a=2
4. (1)(2)together ok
5. -6. 没法做。。。
7. (1)alone ok
8. (1) (2) together ok
9. (1) alone ok
10. 7分之(5-3倍根号2)
11. (2) alone ok
12. 5倍根号3
13. 1:4
14. 3倍根号5
15. 4/33
16. (1) (2) together not ok
17. 15
18. (2) alone is enough
19. (2) alone is enough
47#
发表于 2010-6-29 19:25:30 | 只看该作者
楼主太威武 先膜拜 晚点来讨论
48#
发表于 2010-6-29 19:33:28 | 只看该作者
7 DS(4a+5)/a, 四舍五入到个位, 问个位value
(1) a>10
(2) 0<a<20


请教一下,如果是4.48,这种会四舍五入到5吗?
49#
发表于 2010-6-29 19:40:24 | 只看该作者
窃以为不能,所以我选(1)alone is ok
50#
发表于 2010-6-29 19:47:55 | 只看该作者
不好意思,猛然明白自己的愚钝,有点昏了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-1 14:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部