Argument新题：汽车业做慈善

neoflash

1.The following appeared in a memorandum from the head ofa human resources department at a major automobile manufacturing company to thecompany's managers:

“Studies have found that employees of not-for-profit organizationsand charities are often more highly motivated than employees of for-profitcorporations to perform well at work when their performance is not beingmonitored or evaluated. Interviews with employees of not-for-profitorganizations suggest that the reason for their greater motivation is thebelief that their work helps to improve society. Because they believe in theimportance of their work, they have personal reasons to perform well, even whenno financial reward is present. Thus, if our corporation began donating asignificant portion of its profits to humanitarian causes, our employees’motivation and productivity would increase substantially and our overallprofits would increase as well.”

Discuss how well reasoned . . .etc.

这题逻辑错误我主要看出两个，第三个很牵强，大家有什么思路？

Firstly, the author makes an improper analogybetween not-for-profit organizations and automobile manufacturing company.

Secondly, the author gratuitously assumes thatemployees who work for automobile manufacturing companies share the samefeeling with those who work for not-for-profit organizations.

sherryelan

profit  问题。。。。因为donate，最后profit可能不会上升
working is not being monitored or evaluated 不大可信，大多数工作都会被evaluated ，
公司所donate的项目不一定是公司员工所希望的可以helps to improve society的项目
我就看出来这三个，楼主关于错误对比的问题我一开始没看出来，谢谢提醒了

neoflash

不好意思，我第一个没帖全，其实我们是同一个意思。还是差一个点。
Firstly, the author makes an improper analogy between not-for-profit organizations and automobile manufacturing company. There is no evidence given in this report showing that automobile manufacturing company can benefit from contributions to humanitarian causes, although its employee may do feel motivated. One possible example to weaken this argument is that the increased profits, due to adoption of this strategy, can not cover the according costs.