which one is better

gonghao

Hard choice

I vote for A at first and move to B at last.

Ban was created because of public safety.

Ban should be loosen because of public safety,too.

If public safety is definitely threatened by ban of hurting,the ban should be taken out of the way.

B is said that accidents involving deers will actually jeparodize safety of the public.

A is saying that no ban ,no more deers.But conclusion is drawn from the public safety.If it is the truth,the ban must be taken out for sure.

Open to disscuss.  

davidli8888

My vote is A too. The hidden assumption is that the ban causes all the safety issues. Ban leads to increase in the size of deers, which pose the threat to the public safety. What can suppot the hidden assumption? Of course A, which by analogue provides evidence that without the ban, the county can free of the problem.

Choice B only talks about the damage to deers, not to the point.

花仙子

UP

wenjuanshen

hao

Fisherman

Is there a formal answer to this quesiton?

I vote B, since A only talking about the population of deer, what if there are a lot injuries due to hunting gun shots in the surrounding country?

  

amor924

agree with you!

aces

选A

根据原文结论的推理,得出the ban was not only unnecessary but has created a danger to public safety that would not otherwise exist,有两个前提.一是there were never any hunting-related injuries in the county,这个是对应unnecessary.第二个前提是:是ban造成的public safety.而前文已经论述了:ban导致deer多,从而导致 invading residential areas, damaging property and causing motor vehicle accidents.这二个前提有两个逻辑链.

题目问的是:additional supports.

显然:B对应的是刚才第二个前提的第二个逻辑链,只是重复而已,不是additional support.

而A采用无因无果的方法,对ban导致deer多进行support.

所以我选A

laurenplus

I like B because it is more correlated with the conclusion.

sicivi

以下是引用yaoyao99在2006-5-20 10:37:00的发言：
I'd go with A.

Fact 1: There is a ban on hunting
Fact 2. Deer population has increased => threat on public safety
Conclusion: The ban is unncessary + caused the threat 

A illustrates the fact that: no ban => no increase in deer population (connects fact 1 with fact 2)
B digresses by talking about the consequence of a motor accident involving deers.

有理。我也这么认为..

倒是lawyer大大无心插柳种下这么一棵大树，如今绿树成荫他也不来公布一下正确答案阿！真是神仙般的人物。。。

水里游

up