ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2310|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Lsat-1-1-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-4 09:28:00 | 只看该作者

Lsat-1-1-16

16. Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.



Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?



(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.



(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.



(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.



(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.



(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.






以前NN的回答:原题是 more stringent rules ->airplane mechanical problems have increased 50%
此处是排除他因。原题说RULES引起 increased 50%,假设Mechanical problems自己没increased 50%。 C如取非,原题不成立。E取非,不反原题。这个E不是可能性假设。






我错选D,D取非 reluctant to report不能导致problem increase所以错


1.但是我还是理解D是他因削弱,less reluctant to report导致problem increase。哪里错了?


2.assumption 除了取非weaken原命题外还有什么方法排除干扰选项?比如D,我就FT了




沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-4 09:29:00 | 只看该作者

看了以前的帖子,没有说到B,sigh~~!大概太笨蛋了,没人选B~~


等待NN指教!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-4 10:18:46编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2004-4-4 10:57:00 | 只看该作者

D选项是关于愿不愿意的问题,是主观问题,题干是关于客观问题,故为无关项

B是起WEAKEN作用,不是ASSUMPTION

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-4-4 12:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-4-4 10:57:00的发言:

D选项是关于愿不愿意的问题,是主观问题,题干是关于客观问题,故为无关项


我觉得这个解释有点牵强

可以理解成airlines less reluctant to report--》report increase

而非more strigent rules --》report increase,明显的他因啊?

而且觉得more strigent rules --》airlines less reluctant to report--》report increase变成了两步推理,没有必要了

有NN有别的解释吗?

5#
发表于 2004-4-4 16:40:00 | 只看该作者

不是NN。


我觉得这道题涉及一个常会出现的问题:概念的偏差。


这道题相关的两个概念是:problems和reports of problems


passage的推理是:因为制度严了,所以reports of problems上升。


B说problems本身大量上升,就是指出reports of problems上升的原因是problems本身上升,而非制度的完善,起到的是weaken的作用,而不是assumption。


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-4 19:21:34编辑过]
6#
发表于 2004-4-4 19:12:00 | 只看该作者

原文逻辑:新方案-->机械故障报告增多


D不是假设,是weaken; 它指出机械故障报告可能不是由于新方案,而是他们更原意报告而造成的

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-29 15:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部