ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2583|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]陈向东归纳51

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-3 12:30:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]陈向东归纳51

    

51. Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.


Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.


                             Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?


(A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate.


(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved.


(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.


(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.B


(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.

答案B,陈在解释E是叙述道:E选项把一个结论成立的必要条件当成了该结论成立的充分条件。但是在解释归纳题的做法的时候陈又单列出一种“必要条件”题型,请问这里陈的解释对吗?B又是如何推出的?

沙发
发表于 2004-4-3 19:31:00 | 只看该作者
    

51. Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.fficeffice" />


    


Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.


    


Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?


    


(A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate.


    


(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved. ZL认为它的观点是不可反驳的,但是如果是RP(Responsible psychologist)则必需承认其观点可被反驳.


    


(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.


    


(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.B


    


(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists. 接受新的证据àResponsible psychologist.


注意原文:Anson: Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.


Responsible psychologistà 接受新的证据

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-27 11:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部