ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: gmat928
打印 上一主题 下一主题

which指代小结,请NN指正

[精华]   [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2010-9-6 18:36:20 | 只看该作者
大好人,受益匪浅!
22#
发表于 2010-9-7 21:52:22 | 只看该作者

呵呵,有个倡议

首先感谢lz的辛苦总结
事无巨细,人无完人,理论难免有些例外
有lz的辛勤总结作基础,剩下的我们大家努力把自己发现的例外补上,让这一贴由小结成长为“GMAT的which指代大全”,
呵呵,不知大家支持否,我先来补一贴:
答案中which发生跳跃指代,而且emission不处于介词短语中
OG12SC107
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton- induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton- induced X-ray emission,
答案A
23#
发表于 2010-9-7 21:56:45 | 只看该作者
其实也建议版主们考虑下“基础总结(NN make)+特例补全(everyone make)”的模式,能够将精华贴进一步完善,本人不才,胡言乱语,赶快躲砖: )
24#
发表于 2010-9-8 08:47:06 | 只看该作者
看完了lz的归纳以后我真是有如醍醐灌顶啊!!!特别是跳跃修饰那块,对我帮助简直太大了!!!多谢!!!
25#
发表于 2010-9-11 16:52:43 | 只看该作者
这个就厉害了!解释了疑惑
26#
发表于 2010-9-11 21:45:41 | 只看该作者
Thanks for sharing...

very useful summary.
27#
发表于 2010-10-11 20:50:12 | 只看该作者
感谢楼主分享!
28#
发表于 2010-10-14 10:46:56 | 只看该作者
不说声谢谢是不行的 对我帮助太大了
29#
发表于 2010-10-14 19:45:06 | 只看该作者
谢谢。问下OG12-SC10
10. Carnivorous mammals can endure what would
otherwise be lethal levels of body heat because they
have a heat-exchange network which kept the brain
from getting too hot.
(A) which kept
(B) that keeps
(C) which has kept
(D) that has been keeping
(E) having kept
解释说 In (A) and (C), which
introduces a restrictive clause. Some writers
follow the convention that which can only be used
for nonrestrictive clauses, but insistence on this
rule is controversial, and both (A) and (C) can be
rejected on other grounds.

请问大家OG它是不是说, 名词 直接加WHICH的用法是对还是错存在争议,不可以作为评判对错的标准吗?谢谢。
-- by 会员 abjure (2010/4/29 22:21:42)




我是这样理解的 og中提到“which的用法仍存在争议,而且在A,C中仍存在其他理由可以排除A,C”所以我觉得可以理解为og在设置含有N+which用法的选项时,一定同时还设置其他明显的没有争议的错误好让这个选项一定是错误的,而不会因为n+which这样有争议的用法使这个选项即有正确的可能又有错误的可能。也就是说,见到有含有n+which的选项一定是错误的,因为他一定含有其他的明显的错误。(但这不代表说宣布n+which的用法就是错误的,og也说了嘛,这个用法尚有争议~)

纯属个人见解,如有不妥,大家一定要帮忙指正哈~~~~
30#
发表于 2010-10-15 11:00:04 | 只看该作者
很有用哦,一直都蛮困惑的咧。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 18:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部