lsat-5-2-3t 希望讨论

麻集爱

3.In Europe, schoolchildren devote time during each school day to calisthenics. North American schools rarely offer a daily calisthenics program. Tests prove that North American children are weaker, slower, and shorter-winded than European children. We must conclude that North American children can be made physically fit only if they participate in school calisthenics on a daily basis.
Which one of the following is assumed in the passage?
(A) All children can be made physically fit by daily calisthenics.
(B) All children can be made equally physically fit by daily calisthenics.
(C) Superior physical fitness produces superior health.
(D) School calisthenics are an indispensable factor in European children’s superior physical fitness.
(E) North American children can learn to eat a more nutritious diet as well as to exercise daily.
大案"d  但个人以为indispensable 不妥,说SC是EPF的不可剥夺的因素 就是说是必要条件
但是有可能是很多因素加上SC一起使得EPF , 希望讨论.

dansy

个人觉得题干的结论是，North American    childeren physically fit (NA PF)=>school calisthenics (SC). (only if A, B== B=>A).    那么题目就是要在NA PF 和E PF (euoprean children physciall fit)之间建立某种关系，这个关系由D：E PF=> SC 来建立。

麻集爱

俺这么理解阿。　


结论美国孩子因为。。。。怎么则么样了


原文意思是想说说两者有可比性。所以就要假设欧洲孩子因为。。。　怎么怎么样了，


但是　　这个假设带到原文中　结论不能成立，就是说　一大堆情况以后，如果假设欧洲孩子　。。怎么怎么样了，那么所以美国孩子因为。。。。怎么则么样了　。　其实还差证明　两者其它方面一致／无不同。　


对么？ 写写DANSY

dansy

对，你的思考是更严谨些。象这样的题目排除法可以找出答案，矮子中挑高个吧。

wwwweng

LSAT的题都是严谨的



我这么理解：题干的结论是：North American children physically fit =>school calisthenics；


其实文章说得就是North American & European children physically fit =>school calisthenics


那school calisthenics就是physically fit 的必要条件


当然选d


取非的方法好像也行


仅代表个人观点，大家讨论

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-1 22:51:28编辑过]