【求助】又是一道没有思路看不懂的题GWD5-Q27:

snail007

GWD5-Q27:

Asignificant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to bereworked under the company’s warranty. The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory.  When initial repairs are inadequate,therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there isclearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that iselicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.



Theargument above assumes which of the following?



A.   There is no systematic differencein membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and thegroup of those who do rework jobs.

B.   There is no company thatsuccessfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs.

C.   Ace Repairs’ warranty is good onfirst-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs.

D.   Ace Repairs does not in any waypenalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to bereworked.

E.    There is no category of repairjobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobssatisfactorily.

Bourne_NY

尖修理公司接过的复杂活儿在质保期内有很多都得返工，但返工的活儿质量都令人满意。说第一次修理不足的，不是因为技工师傅的手艺不好，而是因为对于需要二次返工的重视程度不一样。

然后问assumption，

A说做一次和返工的师傅们（手艺）没区别，自然是正确选项。

BCE都扯远了。

D说对于工作需要返工的师傅们，公司不扣奖金——听起来有点意思，作为题设的一个可能原因还行，但把它说成assumption就不靠谱了。

snail007

非常感谢！

终于读懂了，原来读题的时候把repair job跟 rework jobs弄成一回事了。而且对这句话没有理解:
there isclearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairsrequire that iselicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-timejobs.

现在明白了，谢谢

尖修理公司接过的复杂活儿在质保期内有很多都得返工，但返工的活儿质量都令人满意。说第一次修理不足的，不是因为技工师傅的手艺不好，而是因为对于需要二次返工的重视程度不一样。

然后问assumption，

A说做一次和返工的师傅们（手艺）没区别，自然是正确选项。

BCE都扯远了。

D说对于工作需要返工的师傅们，公司不扣奖金——听起来有点意思，作为题设的一个可能原因还行，但把它说成assumption就不靠谱了。

-- by 会员 Bourne_NY (2009/12/20 20:24:02)

bikepack

我也是最后一句没读明白...