求两篇Argument思路不在题库中，后天考，机经中的~忘好心人帮忙

cherrymayin

“Currently, more professional accountants use SmartPro accounting software than any other brand. However, in the market for personal accounting software for non-professionals to use in preparing their income tax returns, many of our competitors are outselling us. In surveys, our professional customers repeatedly say that they have chosen SmartPro Software because our most sophisticated software products include more advanced special features than competing brands. Therefore, the most effective way for us to increase sales of our personal accounting software for home users would clearly be to add the advanced special features that our professional software products currently offer.”
这题貌似考了两次了！
“Our factory in Cookville is our most advanced and efficient. It is capable of producing ten drill bits for each dollar of production costs, whereas none of our other factories can produce more than seven drill bits per dollar of production costs. Therefore, we can reduce our overall drill bit production costs by devoting the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production. Since reducing the production costs of individual machine parts is the only way to achieve our larger goal of reducing our overall production costs, dedicating the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production and shifting all other machine part production to our other factories will help us to attain that larger goal.”
这题完全理解不了意思，忘了解的同学解释下！不胜感激~

AllenZX

路过顺便想下以防考到.
第一篇
1. false analogy between professional client and home user
2. The suvey is vague. does not specify detail information
3. all things equal(勉强)
4. suffciency

第二个:
1. 必要性问题, does not necessarily the only method
2. gratuitous assumption: the C factory's production capacity can meet the requirement. If not, the conclusion is false.
3. also problematic assumption that Cookville can not produce other parts more efficiently than the other factories do.

zscsl

1题：专业会计用smartpro(我们的品牌）因为有advanced special features，而非专业的会计不用我们的，因此如果想增加销售的话，就在这些非专用会计的立面添加advanced special features。
论点1：这个调查是有问题的，这些专业会计的顾客哪里来的。得到的数据是否充分，是不是仅仅调查一小部分的人就得出的结论，也有可能advanced special features根本不是他么购买我们产品的直接原因
论点2：即使advanced special features是他们购买的直接原因，那儿用在 professional accountants 可以，并不意味着用在 personal accounting software for home user也可以。也就是错误类比，有可能是因为其他原因造成的，而不是缺少这个特点造成的。列举一下。。。。比如说价格呀。。什么促销手段。。售后服务呀。。

2题
在C这个地方的工厂能够以更低的成本去生产drill bit,因此就应该吧所有的drill bits 都让他来生产，而同时把其余机器的零部件让其他企业去上产这样能降低成本，因为只有降低机器的每个零部件的成本，才能降低总成本
论点1：把所有的drill bits 给C的工厂做，其实成本就不一定低了。当初低可能是因为有同行业的竞争导致的，使得C工厂的效率很高，然而一旦都给了他，他缺乏竞争造成垄断，就可能导致成本的升高。
论点2：即使drill bits 给C后成本低了，并不意味着总成本低，因为把其他零部件交给其他厂，可能造成其他零部件的生产成本骤然增加而且幅度要大于 drillbits降低的幅度，这样的话总成本不但没有降低反而升高了。。

我也超级没想法，所以。一起讨论一下哈。你觉得呢。。

珞珞啃书

第一篇：
错误类比，文章把专业用户跟家庭用户类比
调查有效性， 文章中没有指明被调查者的情况，可能调查了很多用户，但是回应的人很少，或者说回应的人都是因为这个软件的先进性，而更多的没回应的用户并不是因为这个
（暂时想到这两个）

第二篇的削弱我不知道怎么归类。。。但是里面the only way过于绝对化，common sense tells us 应该有其他方案；其他工厂生产别的产品照样比在C的工厂花费多，这样的话，把其他产品放到别的工厂生产就不能帮公司达到目标；当把所有db放到C的工厂生产时，可能造成人工不足或者设备超负荷运转，反而增加了维修成本等。。。

FlipFlops

2 cents：
Software: "the most way for us"?
               "other factors our competitors are outselling us"

Cookville: "the quality of the ten/$"
               "how many can be so efficiently? 1% or 98% workers?"
               "whether the 'shifting' will work?"

见到绝对词“most only”等就否定　一般都不会错
祝顺利～

cherrymayin

谢谢大家的回答，尤其是2楼的解释，谢谢了！
3楼的MM才考完就解答问题谢谢你啦~