ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: a9141067s
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助OG12-107之前沒有討論過

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2011-3-8 00:53:05 | 只看该作者
5l的解释很强大。。。D理解了。。。

可是A为神马不对类?
12#
发表于 2011-3-8 00:58:49 | 只看该作者
说白了,这道题就是单量*数量=总量
residual ash/per truckloak  *  number of truckloads=total of residual ash
-- by 会员 efay (2010/1/30 9:12:03)



我是想说,E选项是建立在separated了的refuse for recyling不会被incinerated的基础上,如果被recyled的refuse也会incinerated呢?做这道题的时候,觉得A和E是从两个出发点考虑的。。。
13#
发表于 2011-3-8 02:08:03 | 只看该作者
A is simply too restrictive to be an assumption for this question. Once the city reaches its goal of 50% less burning, it can burn all the trash it wants.
14#
发表于 2011-3-8 02:17:38 | 只看该作者
sdcar大侠好OG... 再举手:A是错在too restrictive,而题目的问题是which is required不是which is the most supportive上吗?
15#
发表于 2011-3-8 02:19:45 | 只看该作者
Required in this case = must-be-true; not might be true.
16#
发表于 2011-3-8 02:42:37 | 只看该作者
谢谢大侠~一旁消化去了
17#
发表于 2011-3-26 03:05:32 | 只看该作者
不懂E....谁解释一下啊555555555555555555
18#
发表于 2011-3-27 16:43:25 | 只看该作者
(E) The total quantity of refuse collected by
Shelbyville city services this year will be no
greater than that collected last year.

我的理解:
1.Required in this case = must-be-true
2.E项是非必要条件(因为E的否命题不能一定导致Program失败)
19#
发表于 2011-7-9 00:25:25 | 只看该作者
还是不明白,题目中第一句Last year all refuse collected by Shelbyville city services was incinerated.指的应该是去年回收的垃圾都被焚烧了吧。楼上有人说文章说的目的是要把烧垃圾的 residual ash减少一半,但文中只说In order to reduce the amount of residual ash Shelbyville generates this year to half of last year's total,我的理解应该是目标今年产生的废气是去年的一半,那么如果去年的垃圾都烧了,今年的一部分回收利用了,一部分烧了,产生的废气不就少了吗?
所以我选了C,求指导
20#
发表于 2011-7-9 00:38:33 | 只看该作者
还是不明白,题目中第一句Last year all refuse collected by Shelbyville city services was incinerated.指的应该是去年回收的垃圾都被焚烧了吧。楼上有人说文章说的目的是要把烧垃圾的 residual ash减少一半,但文中只说In order to reduce the amount of residual ash Shelbyville generates this year to half of last year's total,我的理解应该是目标今年产生的废气是去年的一半,那么如果去年的垃圾都烧了,今年的一部分回收利用了,一部分烧了,产生的废气不就少了吗?
所以我选了C,求指导
-- by 会员 davidpan86 (2011/7/9 0:25:25)



C) is not required because it is possible that there were already more than 50% recyclable materials in trash last year. If that was the case, as long as the recyclable portion this year is as large as that in last year, the goal of the city is achievable. Thus, C) is not a necessary assumption.

If C) changes to "Refuse collected by city services will contain at least 50% recyclable materials this year,", then C) would be a necessary assumption.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 06:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部