新prep破解第二套，122题~ 严重不能理解啊……

cynthia627

Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.  arents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated.  A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children.  However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.

B. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as injectable vaccines do.

C. The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.

D. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.

E. The nasal spray vaccine is not effective when administered to adults.

OMA

这道题ABC肯定是直接扔掉了。DE这块，我真是觉得E更有道理。D说adults不会从孩子那里得到influenza。但是题目中已经说过，他人都打了疫苗了啊？就是contract也没什么关系了。E这条线呢，我是这样想的。小孩得influenza没什么问题，所以这新出的喷剂也就没必要用了。但是大人得这个病有问题，大人又得打疫苗。如果这个喷剂对大人有效，大人不用打疫苗，这药也就不能说没用了……

我不知道是这道题我哪里是不是理解错了……郁闷啊……请大家指点啊！！！

ajassmine

文章ARGUE的是：感冒，大人家有危险，所以大人接种；小孩子没危险，所以小孩不必接种。推出结论：普及小孩无痛接种没有太大意义（但对成人来说，无痛接种是有社会意义的）。

D. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
这个论题建立的基础就是小孩不接种也没有关系（大人不会被小孩传染），如果大人主要都被小孩传染，那小孩必须要接种了。。。那普及小孩接种就有社会意义了。所以D对。

E. The nasal spray vaccine is not effective when administered to adults. 但对成人来说，无痛接种是有社会意义的，所以，E错。

cynthia627

嗯，是这样滴。我又犯自我解读的毛病了……妄自把结论理解为了这喷剂没意义了。应该是仅仅对儿童接种没有意义……谢谢！

flyingbenben

楼主能不能把PREP破解的CR发给我一下。。。。非常感谢。。。

我的邮箱是flyingben(在) gmail.com...

谢谢！

water8water

楼主～～～你也能不能把prep逻辑的破解版发给我一下。。。。。
我的邮箱是water8water(＠) 126.C0M
非常感谢。。。。。。。。。。。。！！！

melodyhoo

哎，我也发现逻辑的新Prep下不了了
楼主能不能发一份
melodyhoo(＠) 126.C0M
多谢多谢

tony0329

麻烦楼主也给我发一份吧 十分感谢 tony0329(＠) 126.C0M

ipanema

一直都在找Prep CR，麻烦楼主也给发一份！谢谢！！

油箱：ipanema09(A) hotmail.com

itssuperoli

Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.                    

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
大人能接受注射型也能接受鼻喷型疫苗。与应用鼻喷的好处无关，杀。
B The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as injectable vaccines do.
无关信息，杀  
C The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.  
无关
D Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.  
小孩不传染给大人流感。小孩子自己打不打无所谓，因为他们都不会有流感反应。如果他们不给大人传染病，小孩子就更没有理由打鼻喷式疫苗了，对。
E The nasal spray vaccine is most effective when administered to adults.  
莫名奇妙的比较。杀。文中问的是小孩子打疫苗的必要性。
目的：解释不广泛应用鼻喷在小孩子身上的合理性。
逻辑：背景／小孩子怕疼，小孩子没有严重的流感症状，大人有流感症状，大人都接受注射型疫苗。
现在有一个不疼的鼻喷疫苗，可以给小孩子有效的保护。但是事实是小孩子没有严重的流感症状，打不打对小孩子都一样。然而对大人，如果小孩子对大人有传播流感的能力，小孩子就必须打疫苗。如果小孩子不传播给大人流感，那小孩子打不打疫苗都行。D选项否定了小孩子必须打疫苗的唯一必要，所以这种鼻喷型疫苗，小孩无需打。
没有public benefit.

meiyw

itssuperoli 发表于 2016-9-9 17:24
Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. Parents are reluctant to  ...

who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated 但是题目特别说大人已经打过疫苗了，小孩打不打的关键，按正常思维就是他们自己的小命受不受流感并发症影响。所以D选项也不太对呀。