小心我们的机经被外国人出卖了！！！

vachelkenny

有些韩国人一向傻X的
脑子里塞泡菜了
Speechless
应该有一个韩国人说：研究表明 GMAT考试是韩国人发明的

pdsb

先不提韩国的事情。

最基本的事实是：用机经考试是不对的，虽然我们已经习以为常而不觉得有什么不对了。既然用了、占便宜了希望大家都低调一点，别用了还觉得挺光荣一样到处宣扬。虽然团结的局面很振奋人心，但要明白这不是多么光明正大的团结，而是团结地做一件不对的事，虽然这件事对参与其中的大家“有利”。

我考试时也看了机经，没资格评论别人，只是希望大家保持头脑清醒，至少别忘了这件事是不对的。

zhaoruiliu

she is a fucking bitch.

heavennancy

我也来顶一下这个帖子，得了便宜还卖乖的人最无耻。加强CD的管理，中国人要团结起来

yangli317

Since the GMAT question pool is the same all over the world each month, you get a chance about 6% to meet the same question I meet this month. OK, if 100 person each write down 10 questions he met in this month, then to each question (for example NO.966 of the monthly pool),the possibility it is included in the monthly “JJ” is :1- (1-10/1200) ^100≈56.88% !!!

这个韩国人的这段话是多么好的一篇逻辑材料呀：

The argument above relies on the assumption that there is no overlap among the 10 questions given by each of the 100 test takers.

The argument will be seriously undermined if we argue that there are always lots of overlaps among questions given by different test  takers.

elm

xx

nds881

这么变态的人都有！真丢人

Avène

必顶！

Avène

怎么没顶上去？？

oNshOt

Since the GMAT question pool is the same all over the world each month, you get a chance about 6% to meet the same question I meet this month. OK, if 100 person each write down 10 questions he met in this month, then to each question (for example NO.966 of the monthly pool),the possibility it is included in the monthly “JJ” is :1- (1-10/1200) ^100≈56.88% !!!

这个韩国人的这段话是多么好的一篇逻辑材料呀：

The argument above relies on the assumption that there is no overlap among the 10 questions given by each of the 100 test takers.

The argument will be seriously undermined if we argue that there are always lots of overlaps among questions given by different test  takers.

-- by 会员 yangli317 (2009/11/19 11:13:08)

哈哈哈，可以的！

狗日的韩国猪！据说因为这件事，鸡麦克开始查美国转载极尽的网站，最后导致40多个人成绩取消，并通知所有大学作弊！！！