ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 892|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于眼病哪个鸡鸡题目!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-7 10:29:00 | 只看该作者

关于眼病哪个鸡鸡题目!!!

Diagnosis of drivers who incurred fatal car accidents reveals that among those drivers under 50 with fatal accidents, 5% are diganosed to have P**(一种眼部疾病). This disease affects peripheral vision. However among entire population under 50, only 3% are diagnosed to be infected with P**. Therefore it is the P** disease that has led to drivers' fatal accidents.

 

A. Many patients with P** in later stage cannot drive because their sights are seriously hurt.

B. Diagnosis of P** requires use of a kind of test. However it's unlikely that people under 50 will take this test.

C. Although P** is considered to happen more often among ppl over 50, some younger ppl, who are in their 30s and 40s, are also infected with it.

D. Except from impact on peripheral vision, P** does not have impacts on other vision abilities.

E.说患眼病不妨碍视力

看大家的意见是B,不知道是为什么嗄!

沙发
发表于 2009-10-7 10:41:00 | 只看该作者

英文回答, 因為中文並不好

If this is the weakening question, I will choose B. The argument uses "However among entire population under 50, only 3% are diagnosed to be infected with P**." to draw the conclusion.

Therefore, in answer B: "Diagnosis of P** requires use of a kind of test. However it's unlikely that people under 50 will take this test."

It pretty much means that many people who are under 50 in the population and are infected with P *are not counted* Since a test is needed to determine people who are infected with P, there might be people who are under 50 in the population and don't drive, so many of them are probably infected with P but they just don't know.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/7 10:46:08编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-7 10:49:00 | 只看该作者

Seems like A is to strength the argument....

Great thanks.

地板
发表于 2009-10-7 10:52:00 | 只看该作者

問題是,鉤鉤作者沒有說這個問題是問什麼 - 但是應該 weakening.

5#
发表于 2009-10-7 10:54:00 | 只看该作者
希望有更多這個月CR鉤鉤
6#
发表于 2009-10-7 10:55:00 | 只看该作者

该题的结论是: P** disease led to accidents。推出这个结论的理由是:闯祸的drivers得P的概率是5%,整体是3%。因为闯祸的drivers得P的概率 》整体得P得概率,所以就推断出是由于P导致闯祸。

问weaken。 B是说3%这个数字不对。这样就削弱了推理的依据。

一开始觉得是E,但E的表达好像跟原文有点冲突,原文说This disease affects peripheral vision.

7#
发表于 2009-10-7 11:10:00 | 只看该作者
The argument's 結構 is based on the percentage comparison. If the 3% is not accurate, then the author cannot draw the conclusion based on the percentage.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/7 11:10:58编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-27 00:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部