OG12th-89, 没有找到以前的讨论

jillchenyy

楼上的意思是因为有might所以d中的第二段 "the argument seeks to establish." 就不那么准确了,不知道我理解得对吗

elephantybee

我试下： 

这个argument的主要想要establish a conclusion that "that might well be too optimistic",其中that 指股民对高层管理人员买股票这一现象的结论。所以，since 后面（第二句黑字）所给出的是作者对于他这个argument 的解释,而第一句黑字是指出故事发生的环境或现象。

voila.

zdx618

Main conclusion:They might well be overoptimistic,

yidiyuehan

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-398808-1-1.html?SearchText=OG12 89

另外一个讨论,我觉得这个题目的D 选项ETS 给的解释太玄乎了, 我就是看了解释晕的.
我觉得D &E 选项没有把握整个argument 的主旨, 作者主要是想说 高层买股票就以为这个银行没啥事 有点太乐观了. 而不是整个为了去解释高层为啥买股票.  BF2 也不是那个作者想establish 的 explanation, 而是用来support his position that 高层买股票就以为这个银行没啥事 有点太乐观了.

eva01

表示是因为去除谣言只是高管买股票的一种可能，还有其他的可能比如说就是看好公司，D选项的意思是只有去除谣言一种可能，这是不对滴

奶牛316

zxlstoner 发表于 2009-10-8 21:26
个人感觉OG里面解释的比较清楚了。D选项错误是因为，作者并没有去establish any argument，而只是对BF1所支 ...

我觉得你的这个解释很精准

MMMM25

89 Since it has because known that several of a bank's to executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A The first describe evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
B The first describe evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a countrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.
C The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.
D The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
E  The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.

正确答案
推理类型：
前提：several of a bank's executives have been buying shares in their own bank,

直接结论1： top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness.
or
直接结论2： corporate executives have been nown to buy shares in their own company in calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors   

最终结论： the worry of the impending financial collapse is wrong.


这是我想的解释，为什么A对D不对？大家看看能解释的同吗？
为什么D不对呢，因为第二个BF是不能得到最终结论的，它是反最终结论的。为什么A对呢，如果按照第一种引申义，the first BF 加第一种引申义是支持最终结论的，而第二个BF恰巧又是质疑前提对结论的支持的。

DeliciaAn

MMMM25 发表于 2015-8-26 17:32
89 Since it has because known that several of a bank's to executives have been buying shares in the ...

注意A选项说的很隐蔽：supporting a conclusion。而不是supporting a main conclusion.这是不一样的。

IWANT750

Depositors were worried  by rumors.

Depositors get confidence again because of the top executives of the bank buy shares of their own bank.

Top executives of banks buys shares on purpose: to dispel the rumor instead of being confidence of the bank.
----------------------------------------
Sorry that I can't type Chinese.

gloooooria

请问describe evidence和describe circumstances是一回事吗？