ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 615|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

AI模版中的问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-18 00:36:00 | 只看该作者

AI模版中的问题

看到一个AI模版,可是不理解其中这些标红缩写是什么意思。
We take for granted that A. Nevertheless, does the fact inevitable indicates that B? The speaker here apparently tempts to confirm that the former takes automatic precedence over the latter. While I agree with the spear insofar as A, I find no empirical evidence to wholly accept the author’s position, which appears to be unconvincing in light of more persuasive assertion, those TS.


The primary reason for my view rests on the undeniable fact that history is replete with evidence of R1. Notables ranging from X to Y come immediately to mind. On the one hand, consider the success of X. On the other hand, let us take Y into account. By the same token, Y does the same. Indeed, both cases illustrate the point that R1, as many other similar cases do. 


Another reason for my view is that R2. Empirical evidence supporting this reason is overwhelming. One needs look no further than Z to appreciate that this is indeed the case. As can be obviously seen, Z is that. Admittedly, stories such as this are not rare so that this case is, as has been noted, one of many examples that underscore the point that.


To oppose my view, you might point out that Q1. To be honest, I confess that Q1. However, you may further argue that Q2. Here we part company. In any event, do Q2? Emphatically, ‘No’.
In the final analysis, TS. Therefore, although.

沙发
发表于 2009-8-18 08:19:00 | 只看该作者

TS 是 topic sentence 吧

XY好像是2个人名的样子~~~自己找两个人名填进去~~~

Q的话是反方可能提出的问题

个人意见哈~仅供参考~~~

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-18 15:09:00 | 只看该作者

不管对不对都多谢了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-13 18:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部