请教第一条逻辑题

xiaoyi

[face=Arial]Some people assert that prosecutors should be allowed to introduce illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials if the judge and jury can be persuded that the arresting officer was not aware of violating or did not intend to violate the law while seizing the evidence. This proposed "good-faith exception" would weaken everyone's constitutional protection, lead to less careful police practices, and promote lying by law enforcement officers in court.
The argument above for maintaining the prohibition against illegally obtained evidence assumes that
A) defendants in crimina cases should enjoy greater protection from the law than other citizens do
B) law enforcement authoritied need to be encouraged to pursue criminals assiduously
c)the legal system will usually find ways to ensure that real crimes do not go unprosecuted
D) the prohibition now deters some unlawful searches and seizures
E) courts should consider the motives of law enforcement officers in deciding whether evidence brought forward by the officers is admissible in a trial[/face]

siebel

trying ...

A) defendants in crimina cases should enjoy greater protection from the law than other citizens do
原文没有被告，更没有和普通人比较保护。

B) law enforcement authoritied need to be encouraged to pursue criminals assiduously
捉拿逃犯本文并无涉及。

c)the legal system will usually find ways to ensure that real crimes do not go unprosecuted
能否绳之以法，并未提及。

D) the prohibition now deters some unlawful searches and seizures
原文讨论的是该不该的问题，不是是不是的问题。

E) courts should consider the motives of law enforcement officers in deciding whether evidence brought forward by the officers is admissible in a trial
取非，如果不考虑差佬的动机，lead to less careful police practices, and promote lying by law enforcement officers in court.就不成立了。所以，是assumption。

欧选E


sigh, wrong again

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-5-12 9:42:28编辑过]

xiaoyi

既然是禁止，就是要否定是否应该考虑动机啊。
如果我这样说：courts needn't consider the motives，because illegally obtained evidence, named good-faith exception, would weaken everyone's constitutional protection……好像也说得过去阿。

cranberry

好象讨论过的。应选D。我的理解是既然要MAINTAIN那么一定是现在正在适用。