|
RC四篇都是机经，有pop out那题 还有博物馆陈列的就是关于culture的那题，记得问的题目有作者提到其中的一个例子的目的是社么 还有就是GWD原题那题，这篇出现的时候我正处于时间不够的危机中，巨长，从没见过这么长的，原文都没看，直接选得，建议最好把这个原文看一下，我贴吧 In 1938, at the government-convened National Health Conference, organized labor emerged as a major proponent of legislation to guarantee universal health care in the United States. The American Medical Association, representing physicians’ interests, argued for preserving physicians’ free-market prerogatives. Labor activists countered these arguments by insisting that health care was a fundamental right that should be guaranteed by government programs. The labor activists’ position represented a departure from the voluntarist view held until 1935 by leaders of the American Federation of labor (AFL), a leading affiliation of labor unions; the voluntarist view stressed workers’ right to freedom from government intrusions into their lives and represented national health insurance as a threat to workers’ privacy. AFL president Samuel Gompers, presuming to speak for all workers, had positioned the AFL as a leading opponent of the proposals for national health insurance that were advocated beginning in 1915 by the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL), an organization dedicated to the study and reform of labor laws. Gompers’ opposition to national health insurance was partly principled, arising from the premise that governments under capitalism invariably served employers’, not workers’, interests. Gompers feared the probing of government bureaucrats into workers’ lives, as well as the possibility that government-mandated health insurance, financed in part by employers, could permit companies to require employee medical examinations that might be used to discharge disabled workers. Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions: the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers. AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power. The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers. That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable. Indeed, the AFL leadership did face serious organizational divisions. Many unionists, recognizing that union-run health programs covered only a small fraction of union members and that unions represented only a fraction of the nation’s workforce, worked to enact compulsory health insurance in their state legislatures. This activism and the views underlying it came to prevail in the United States labor movement and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed its position on health legislation. 有问highlight部分的作用的 还有一篇也是机经，貌似是公司投资创新的，两段，时间严重不够，略略读了一下，直接选，选项不记得了 关于RC机经，建议最好滚瓜烂熟，虽然RC机经很多都没给出题目，但是熟悉RC机经的好处是可以省时间，这次获益多多啊 我郁闷一下，CR居然没有碰到boldface…… | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
楼主
发表于 2009-7-30 22:15:00
