ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1644|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LR0510-3-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-6-8 03:12:00 | 只看该作者

LR0510-3-20

Philosopher: It is absurd to argue that peopel are morally obligated to act in a certain way simply because not action in that way would be unnatural. An unnatural action is either a violation of the laws of nature or a statistical anomaly. There is no possibility of  acting as one cannot, nor does the mere fact that something is not usually done provide any good reason not do it.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a technique used in the philosohpehr's argument?

B stating the definition of  a key term of the argument

能不能解释一下最后一句话什么意思?"There is no possibility of  acting as one cannot"-----很奇怪?
沙发
发表于 2009-6-8 10:11:00 | 只看该作者

“no possibility of  acting as one cannot, nor ”

“no ... cannot, nor”

双重否定表肯定,只要厘清长句之断句。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 10:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部